جنگ نرم شبکه‌های ماهواره‌ای در روان‌سازی سیاست خارجی بین‌المللی کشور‌ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل

نویسنده

دانشیار عضو گروه اجتماعی دانشکده منابع سازمانی دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین تهران ایران

چکیده

با نگاهی به تحولات اخیر مسائل بین الملل و افزایش نقش رسانه ها در روان سازی چرخه سیاست خارجی ،عرصه نوینی در سیاست خارجی با نام دیپلماسی رسانه ای بوجود آمد که علی الاصول به نحوه تاثیر گذاری و نقش رسانه ها بر افکار عمومی جهان و تغییر سیاست خارجی کشورها می پردازد. تاثیر تلویزیون جهانی در حل و فصل مسائل سیاسی و استفاده ابزاری از آن در هدایت افکار عمومی و اعمال فشار بر دست اندر کاران سیاست خارجی(به عنوان ابزار جنگ نرم) ، نویسنده را بر آن داشت که با برجسته نمودن کارایی ارتباطات بین الملل درتبادل اطلاعات و تبلیغات سیاسی بین المللی ؛ قرائت جدیدی از جنگ نرم در سطح روابط بین المللی ارائه دهد.به اعتقاد نویسنده جریان بین المللی اطلاعات به نوعی است که کشورهای صاحب فن آوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات با ایجاد اسطوره سازی ،تبلیغات تجاری و سیاسی ،پیام های خود را متوجه مخاطبین زیادی در سطوح ملی و بین المللی می کنند و اطلاعات سیاسی و اقتصادی و فرهنگی لازم را در راستای منافع سیاسی خود افکار عمومی بین المللی منتقل کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Soft Warfare of Satellite Television Networks in the Field of International Communications

نویسنده [English]

  • Davood Doagooyan
Associate Member of Social Department, Faculty of Organizational Resources, Amin University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Looking at recent developments in international affairs and increasing the role of the media in streamlining the foreign policy cycle, a new arena has emerged in foreign policy which is called media diplomacy, which in principle influences the role of the media in world public opinion and policy change. The impact of global television on resolving political issues and using them as a tool to guide public opinion and put pressure on those involved in foreign policy (as a tool of soft warfare) prompted the author to highlight the effectiveness of international communication in information exchange and international political propaganda; provide a new reading of soft warfare at the level of international relations. Some thinkers believe that in today's turbulent world, global broadcasting by international television networks is essential. Today, global television networks, with the coverage of world news and international events, attract public opinion to the events they are interested in and induce their analysis and interpretation. According to the author, the international flow of information is such that technocrat countries gathering information and communication by creating myths, commercial and political propaganda, conveys their messages to many audiences at the national and international levels, and conveys the necessary political, economic and cultural information in line with their political interests.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • soft warfare
  • international television networks
  • Foreign Policy
  • global propaganda

مراجع

  1. Al-Awini, M. A. (1990). Imperialist Propaganda or International Propaganda, Tehran: Islamic Propaganda Organization Publications.
  2. Alleyne M. D. (1995). International Power and International Communication, London: Palgrave Macmillan
  3. Althaus, S., Tewksbury, D. (2000). Pattern of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community. Political Communication, 4(1), 21-45.
  4. Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media logic and Communication. Journal of Political Communication, 21(4), 293-296.
  5. Castells, E. (2006). The Age of Information, Power and Identity. Translated by Chavoshian, H., Senior Editor Paya, A., 2, Tehran: Tarh-e-No Publications.
  6. Dadgaran, S. M. (2006). Public Opinion and its Measurement Criteria, Tehran: Morvarid Publications, Fourth Edition.
  7. Davison, W. P. (1963). Political Communication as Instrument of Foreign Policy. The Public Opinion Quarlerly, 27(1), 28-36.
  8. Dayan, D., Katz, E. (1992), Media Event: The live Broadcasting of History. Cambridg & MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
  10. Gilboa E. (2002). The Global News Networks and U.S. Policymaking in Defend and Foreign Affairs, Cambridge & MA: The Shorenstein Center on the Press.
  11. Gilboa, E. (2002). Global Communication and Foreign Policy. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 731-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02571.x
  12. Gilboa, E. (2005). The CNN Effect: The Search for a Communication Theory of International Relation. Political Communication, 22(1), 27-44. doi: 10.1080/10584600590908429
  13.   Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/1 0.1177/0002716207312142
  14. Graber, D. A. (2005). Political Communication Faces the 21st Century. Journal of International Communication Association, 55(3), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02682.x
  15. Larson, J. F. (1988). Global television and foreign Policy, New York: Foreign Policy Association.
  16. Lippmann, W. (1931). The Press and Public Opinion. Political Science Quarterly, 46(2), 161-170
  17. Livingston, S. Bennet W. Lonce (2003). Gatekeeping Indexing, And Live Event  News: Is Technology Altering the Construction of News?. Journal of Political Communication, 20(4), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244121
  18. Mohammadi, A. (1997). International Communication and Glibalization, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd
  19. Mohammadi, A. (2008). Globalization and Colonialism, Tehran: Ney Publications.
  20. Mor, B. (2006). Public Diplomacy in Grand Sterategy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 2(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2006.00025.x
  21. Motamednejad, K. (1383). Global Inequality in Communication Development, Communication, Tehran: Research Center Publications.
  22. Motamednejad, K. (2003). Global Information Society Outlook, Communication, Tehran: Research Center Publications.
  23. Naveeh, C. (2002). The Role of the Media in Foreign Policy Decision – Making: A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Conflict and Communication, 1(2). at: http://www.cco.regener-online.de/2002_2/pdf_2002_2/naveh.pdf
  24. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power, New York: Public Affairs.
  25. O’heffernan, P. (1991). Mass Media and American Foreign Policy, New York: Ablex Publications.
  26. Price, V. (2003). Public Opinion. Translated by Ali Rostami, A. and Mir-Tahami, E. Tehran: Publications of the Research Institute for Strategic Studies.
  27. Richard, B. (2004). The Emotional Deficit in Political Communication, Journal of Political Communication, 21(3), 339-352.
  28. Rogers, E. M. (1969). Modernization among Peasants: The Impact of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; First Edition.
  29. Rumi, H. (2005). Global Information and Communication, New Frontiers in International Relations, Translated by Hassanzadeh, O., Tehran: Librarian Publications.
  30. Rumi, H. (2005).Global Communications in Transition, Tehran: Soroush Publications.

فایل ها

اشتراک گذاری

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار