Recently, scholars have in many ways responded to concerns raised by the General Assembly to discuss aspects of UN reform. In this paper the author prepares an analysis and recommendation on ways of strengthening and making the capacity of states in authorizing military force more efficient and within the framework and provisions of the charter. The present determination of use of force in the manner foreseen in the charter has opened the way for two kinds of restrictive and broad interpretation. The author has not so far made use of them, so, he has chosen to provide a defaulted approach. He has drawn particular attention to the proposal that ordering the use of force for preemptive purposes must belong to the U.N. In his address he focuses on using preventive force against potential future threats as well as hostile acts. He points to considering the uncertainties and contradictions that are among the consequences of using force.