شناسایی امارت اسلامی افغانستان (طالبان) از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل

نویسنده

گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

چکیده

گروه طالبان که در معرفی حکومت خود از عنوان «امارت اسلامی افغانستان» استفاده می‌کند، پس از تصرف کابل، رسماً اعضای حکومت موقت خود را معرفی کرد و از سازمان ملل متحد تقاضا کرد تا نماینده‌ آن کشور در سازمان پذیرش شود. در دوره‌ اول حکمرانی طالبان (از سال 1996 تا 2001)، با وجود اعمال حاکمیت موثر آنها بر بخش زیادی از افغانستان، حکومت مذکور از سوی سازمان ملل متحد شناسایی نشد. علی رغم خروج نام این گروه از فهرست گروههای ترویستی شورای امنیت در سال 2011، کماکان نام بسیاری از مقامات عالی رتبه گروه طالبان، در فهرست کمیته تحریمهای شورای امنیت قرار دارد. شورا نیز در قطعنامه 2513 (2020) تاکید کرده بود که از اعاده‌ حکومت امارت اسلامی افغانستان استقبال نمی‌کند و آن را به رسمیت نمی‌شناسد اما در قطعنامه شماره 2593 (2021) که پس از تصرف کابل توسط طالبان صادر شده است، شورا به موضوع عدم شناسایی امارت اسلامی افغانستان اشاره نکرده است. سوال اصلی پژوهش آن است که «آیا امارت اسلامی افغانستان توسط جامعه بین‌المللی و سازمان ملل متحد شناسایی خواهد شد یا خیر؟». روش بررسی این پژوهش، تحلیلی –توصیفی می‌باشد و شیوه ‌گردآوری اطلاعات،کتابخانه‌ای است. نتیجه‌ این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که امارت اسلامی افغانستان، تا زمان اثبات همکاری با دیگر دولت‌ها در مبارزه با گروههای تروریستی نظیر داعش و نیز رعایت هنجارهایی مانند حفظ حقوق بشر و زنان و تشکیل حکومتی فراگیر، از سوی جامعه‌ بین‌المللی بویژه دول غربی شناسایی نخواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Recognition of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (Taliban) from the Perspective of International Law

نویسنده [English]

  • Sattar Azizi
Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Bu-Ali Sina University , Hamedan. Iran
چکیده [English]

The Taliban, which uses the term "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan" to describe its government, formally introduced members of its interim government after occupying Kabul and asked the United Nations to accept its representation in the organization. During the first period of Taliban rule (from 1996 to 2001), despite their effective rule over much of Afghanistan, the government was not recognized by the United Nations. Despite the group's removal from the Security Council's list of terrorist groups in 2011, the names of many high-ranking Taliban officials remain on the Security Council's sanctions committee list. The council also stated in Resolution 2513 (2020) that it does not welcome the recognition of the government of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and does not recognize it. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has not been mentioned. The main question of the research is "Will the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan be recognized by the international community or not?" The method of this research is analytical-descriptive and the method of collecting information is library. The results of this study show that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will not be recognized by the international community until it proves its cooperation with other governments in the fight against terrorist groups such as ISIS and the observance of norms such as the protection of human and women's rights and the formation of an inclusive government.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan
  • Taliban
  • Recognition of Governments
  • Effective governance
  • Democratic Governance
  1. Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan between the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban and the United States of America. (2020). at: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Agreement-For-Bringing-Peace-to-Afghanistan-02.29.20.pdf
  2. Barber, R. (2021). Will the Taliban Represent Afghanistan at the UN General Assembly, at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/will-the-taliban-represent-afghanistan-at-the-un-general-assembly/
  3. Bellal, A., Giacca, G., and Casey-Maslen, Stuart (2011). International law and armed non-state actors in Afghanistan. International Review of the Red Cross, 93(88),47-99.
  4. Bizhan N. (2017). Building legitimacy and state capacity in protracted fragility: The Case of Afghanistan, at: https://www.theigc.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/afghanistan-report-v3.pdf
  5. Brownlie, I. (1982). Recognition in Theory and Practice. British Yearbook of International Law. 53(1)197–211. doi: 10.1093/bybil/53.1.1
  6. CAP National Security and International Policy Team. (2016). State Legitimacy, Fragile States, and U.S. National Security, At:: https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/08062435/StateLegitimacy-report.pdf
  7. Franck, T. (1992). The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance. American Journal of International Law. 86(1) 46-91. doi: 10. 2307/2203138
  8. Ibrahim, Y. (2017). The Taliban`s Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (1996–2001): War making and State-Making as an Insurgency Strategy. Small Wars & Insurgencies. 28(6), 947–972. doi:10.1080/09592318.2017.1374598.
  9. Jackson, A. (2018). Life under the Taliban shadow government, Embassy of Denmark Kabul, At: https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/12269.pdf
  10. Johnson, L. (2021). Export Backgrounder: How Can the Taliban Be Prevented From Rrepresenting Afghanistan In The United Nations, at: https://www.justsecurity.org/77806/expert-backgrounder-how-can-the-taliban-be-prevented-from-representing-afghanistan-in-the-united-nations/
  11. Kraemer, R. (2010). Towards state legitimacy in Afghanistan. Internationl Journal, 65(3), 637-651. doi:10.1177/002070201006500307
  12. Marks, S. (2011). What has Become of the Emerging Right to Democratic Governance?. European Journal of International Law, 22(2) 507–524. doi: 10. 1093/ejil/chr023
  13. McGowan, P. (2003). African military coups d'état, 1956–2001: frequency, trends and distribution, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 41(3), 339 -370. doi: 10.1017/S0022278X0300435
  14. Mirfakhraei, S. (2013). Taliban return to power: Threat to international peace and security, Journal of Political and International Studies,4(15), 143-170. (in Persian)
  15. Mojtahed-Zadeh, P. (2017). Knowing Afghanistan: Can there be an end to the saga?. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 13(4), 63-76.
  16. Osman B. and Gopal A. (2016). Taliban Views on a Future State, Center on International Cooperation, At: https://cic.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/taliban_future_state_final. pdf
  17. Roth B. (2010). Secessions, Coups, and the International Rule of Law: Assessing the Decline of the Effective Control Doctrine. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 11(2), 393-440
  18. S/RES/2543. (2020). https://undocs.org/en/S/RES/2543(2020)
  19. S/RES/2593. (2021). at: https://undocs.org/en/S/RES/2593(2021)
  20. Soheili najafabadi, S., Hossein Khani, E., Amoui, H. (2020). Investigating the Future of NATO Presence in the Middle East and the Surrounding Environment of Iran and Its Impact on the National Security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 17(1), 169-193. doi: 10.22034/isj.2020.118580 (In Persian)
  21. S-PV-883. (2021), at: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/document/s-pv-8831.php
  22. Twelfth Report of the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team submitted Pursuant to Resolution 2557, (2020): Concerning the Taliban and other Associated Individuals and Entities Constituting a Threat to the Peace Stability and Security of Afghanistan https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/sanctions-committee-documents/?ctype=Terrorism&cbtype=terrorism
  23. Volger, H. (2010). A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations. Second Revised Edition, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  24. Weller, M. (20121). Myanmar: Testing the Democratic Norm in International Law, at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/myanmar-testing-the-democratic-norm-in-international-law/30 march 2021
  25. Wet, E. (2019). The Role of Democratic Legitimacy in the Recognition of Governments in Africa since the end of the Cold War. International Journal of Constitutional Law,17(2), 470-478. doi: 10. 1093/icon/moz036.
  26. Wolfrum, R. (2002). The Status of the Taliban: Their Obligations and Rights under International Law, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 6, 559-601.