By reviewing the history of political thoughts, any thought in practice may be different from its theory formulation. Neoconservative is among theories that the gap between theory and practice is clear to the extent that one of its main principles, that is, status que, has been challenged by its contenders Therefore, it is necessary to look at carefully to this school of thought in order to understand real principles, objectives, and means of American neoconservatives. A better understanding of this stream of theory and practice assist us to predict their future behaviors in the current US foreign policy, and prepare suitable means to encounter negative consequences of their objectives. To this end, this article aims at examining theoretical and practical aspects of neoconservatives by looking at their past attitudes. For this purpose, this study describes and explains Bush administration policies in the international level, and in particular, examines neoconservative status towards three subjects of religion, global Zionism, and a quarrel between good and evil, due to the fact that these issues are the main justifications for nominating neoconservatives as fundamentalists. Findings of this study demonstrate that neoconservatives of the white house have been applied practical standards more than theoretical values in reality.