فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی

فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی

عدالت ترمیمی و ظرفیت‌سازی مبارزه با تروریسم در اروپا

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل

نویسندگان
محمد نصیرزاده 1
فریده محمد علیپور 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی خوارزمی. تهران. ایران
2 استادیار دانشکده حقو ق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
10.22034/isj.2025.433984.2126
چکیده
مبارزه با تروریسم از مهم‌ترین مسائل امنیتی اروپا است و رویکرد اولیه کشورهای اروپایی بر عدالت کیفری و جرم‌انگاری ابعاد مختلف تروریسم استوار است درحالی که در گرایش به گروه‌های تروریستی، زمینه‌های اجتماعی و فردی نقش عمده‌ای دارند، لذا از بین بردن این زمینه‌ها مهم تلقی می‌شود. عدالت ترمیمی برای برآوردن این مقصود، رویکرد متفاوتی را پیش‌روی تصمیم‌سازان نهاده است. پرسش این پژوهش این است که چگونه عدالت ترمیمی بر مبارزه با تروریسم در اروپا تاثیر گذاشته است؟ پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از نظریه اجتماع مبتنی بر رویه و کاربست روش تبینی ـ تکوینی و با هدف یاری رساندن به سیاست‌گذاران امنیتی کشور در زمینه مقابله با تروریسم انجام شده است. نتایج پژوهش از طریق واکاوی تجربه کشورهای اروپایی نشان می‌دهد که عدالت ترمیمی از طریق بازاندیشی در تعریف هویت فردی و اجتماعی در مبارزه با تروریسم مؤثر بوده و می‌تواند موجد صلح اجتماعی گردد. این بازاندیشی موجب می‌شود فرد در هویت تروریستی خود تجدیدنظر نماید و در نتیجه بسترهای صلح اجتماعی به وجود ‌آید. تأیید دوباره ارزش‌های جامعه و تقبیح رفتار مجرمانه در نتیجه عدالت ترمیمی در کاهش به حاشیه رانده شدن افراد در مبارزه با افراط‌گرایی و بازگشت آن‌ها به جامعه تاثیر بسزایی دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تروریسم
عدالت ترمیمی
هویت
اجتماع مبتنی بر رویه
اروپا

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Restorative Justice and Capacity Building in Counter-Terrorism Efforts within Europe

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Nassirzadeh 1
Farideh Mohammad Alipour 2
1 Ph.D. Student in International Relations Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

European countries primarily address terrorism, a significant security concern, through criminal justice mechanisms and the criminalization of various terrorist activities. However, it is imperative to address the substantial influence of both social and individual factors on the formation and proliferation of terrorist groups. Restorative justice offers decision-makers an alternative strategy to achieve this goal. The main question of this research is: How has restorative justice influenced the fight against terrorism in Europe? This study applied the principles of community of practice theory and the explanatory-constructive method to assist Iranian security policymakers in their efforts to combat terrorism. An analysis of prior experiences in European countries demonstrates that restorative justice is effective in combating terrorism and can promote social peace by redefining individual and social identities. This redefinition encourages individuals to reconsider their terrorist identity, thereby laying the foundation for social peace. Restorative justice enables society to combat extremism effectively and reintegrate individuals by reinforcing societal values and denouncing criminal behavior. This approach is crucial in reducing marginalization and facilitating successful reintegration into society.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Terrorism
Restoration of Justice
Identity
Community of Practice
Europe
  1. اسماعیلی، مهدی، و ابراهیمی، فرخنده. (1401). بازپروری بزه‌کاران و تجارب بزه‌دیدگان از عدالت ترمیمی.فصلنامه دیدگاه‌های حقوق قضائی، 24(86)، 21-44.
  2. بیت‌جم، رامسین، خسروی، محمدعلی، جلالی، رضا؛ و صادقی‌حقیقی، دیدخت. (1402). مقایسه استراتژی هنجارسازی اتحادیه اروپا و ایالات‌متحده آمریکا در رویاروئی با تروریسم در غرب آسیا. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی، 19(4)، 95-115.
  3. تکار، مونا، و آنه، اسپکارت. (1402). بررسی افزایش تلاش برای نفوذ به وفاداران، به‌ویژه پسران جوان، در اردوگاه الهول توسط شبکه مالی وابسته به داعش. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌المللی، 20(2)، 161-186.
  4. توکلی، سلمان، و نطاق‌پور، مهدی. (1401). واکاوی علل و انگیزه پیوستن جوانان اروپایی به گروه تکفیری داعش. مدیریت و پژوهش‌های دفاعی، 21(96)، 77-108.
  5. جمشیدی. محمد، و رهبری، هدیه. (1398). تروریسم بومی در اروپا. پژوهش‌های روابط بین‌الملل، 9(35)، 223-250.
  6. رادفر، فیروزه، دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سیدجلال. (1401). نظریه کردارگرایی روابط بین‌الملل. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌المللی، 18(4) 7-21.
  7. رحمتی، رضا. (1402). اسلام در سوئد؛ موضوعی اجتماعی، سیاسی یا امنیتی. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌الملل، 20(1)، 57-79.
  8. لطفی، میلاد، و دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سید جلال. (1402). نگرشی نوین به مطالعۀ همگرایی منطقه‌ای: کردارگرایی و کاربست آن در مطالعات همگرایی اروپا.رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین ‌الملل، 15(1)، .11-34
  9. میرمجیدی، سپیده. (1400). ویژگی‌های الگوی مطلوب برنامه‌های عدالت ترمیمی در پرونده‌های خشونت جنسی؛ با نگاهی به گفتمان قضایی ایران. مجله حقوقی دادگستری. 85(114)، 433-463.
  10. Adler, E. (2005). Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundation of International Relations, London: Routledge.
  11. Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, SelfRestraint, and NATO’s Post–Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.
  12. Adler, E. (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International Practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.
  14. Aranguren, I. (2019). El Terrorismo Yihadista en la Encrucijada Oportunidades y Riesgos tras el Derrumbe del Califato. Fundación Centro para la Memoria de las Víctimas del Terrorism, at: https://fundacionvt.org/publicacion/el-terrorismo-yihadista-en-la-encrucijada-2/
  15. Bertagna, G., Ceretti, A. & Mazzucato, C. (2015). Il Libro Dell’incontro. Milan: Il Saggiatore.
  16. Bicchi, F. (2022). Communities of practice and what they can do for International Relations, Review of International Studies, 48(1), 24–43.
  17. Blakeley, R. et.al. (2019). Leaving the War on Terror: A Progressive Alternative to Counter-Terrorism Policy, Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Available at: www.tni.org.
  18. Bueger, Ch. & Gadinger F. (2018). International Practice Theory. Second Edition, Palgrave:
  19. Bueger, Ch. (2012). Communities of Practice in World Politics – Theory or Technology? 52nd Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. Montreal: Canada.
  20. Butt, R., & TUCK, H. (2010). European Counter-Radicalisation and De-radicalisation: A Comparative Evaluation of Approaches in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, European Counter-Radicalisation and De-radicalisation. Retrieved from: https://www.eukn.eu/fileadmin/Files/News/De-radicalisation_final.pdf.
  21. Bytyci, F. (2019). Kosovo brings back fighters, families of jihadists from Syria, reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kosovo-syria-idUSKCN1RW003.
  22. Carter, B. (2017). Analyzing the Criminal Justice and Military Models of Counterterrorism: Evidence from the United States. Master thesis, United States: University of Kansas.
  23. Ceberio, M. (2020). Ética y autocrítica entre rejas. El País. Available at: https://elpais.com/espana/2020-08-05/amor-sin-papeles-entre-rejas.html.
  24. Cornut, J. (2018). Diplomacy, Agency and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice, European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 712–736.
  25. Council of Europe Committee on Counter-Terrorism .(2023). counter-terrorism strategy for 2023-2027 .Available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/pages/result_details.aspx?objectid=0900001680a9ad67
  26. Council of Europe. (2018). Counter-Terrorism Strategy (2018-202(Availableat: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016808afc96.
  27. Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question, Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29.
  28. Dandurand, Y. (2020). Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes. Second Edition. United Vienna: Nations Office on Drugs and Crime United Nations Office.
  29. De Bie, L. (2016). Involvement Mechanisms of Jihadist Networks. Perspectives on Terrorism. 10(5), 22-41.
  30. Erelle, A. (2015). Skyping With the Enemy: I Went Undercover as a Jihadi Girlfriend. The Guardian, Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/26/french-journalist-poses-muslim-convert-isis-anna-erelle.
  31. Eu (2019). Returning Foreign Terrorists: Kosovo Seeks to Integrate ‘ISIS’ Returnees Back Into Society. Available at: https://www.eubulletin.com/10297-returning-foreign-terrorists-kosovo-seeks-to-integrate-isis-returnees-back-into-society.html.
  32. European Commission. (2024). About RAN Practitioners. Available at .: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/radicalisation-awareness-network-ran/about-ran_en.
  33. Forgiveness project. (2019). Jo Berry and Pat Magee. Available at: https://www.theforgivenessproject.com/stories/jo-berry-pat-magee/.
  34. Fuller, A. (2007). Critiquing Theories of Learning and Communities of Practice. In Hughes, J. Jewson, N. & Unwin, (eds). Communities of Practice. Critical Perspectives, London: Routledge.
  35. Gal, T. Dancig-Rosenberg, H., & Guy, E. (2018). Measuring the restorativeness of restorative justice: The case of the Mosaica Jerusalem Programme. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 1(2), 252–273.
  36. Gal, T., & Dancig-Rosenberg, H. (2020). Characterizing multi-door criminal justice: A comparative analysis of three criminal justice mechanisms. New Criminal Law Review, 23(1), 139–166.
  37. Grimmel, A., & Hellmann, G. (2019). Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science. International Political Sociolog, 13(2), 198-214.
  38. (2020). Beratungsprinzipien. Available at: https://hayat-deutschland.de/hayat-deutschland/?c=beratung.
  39. (2020). Influencing and Promoting Global Peace and Security. Available at: https://behorizon.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Horizon-Insights-2020-3.pdf.
  40. (2018). Iraq sentences German woman to death for joining Isis, reports say. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-iraq-sentence-death-german-teenager-linda-wenzel-baghdad-a8170461.html.
  41. Infantino, F. (2019). How does Policy Change at the Street Level? Local Lnowledge, A Community of Practice and EU Visa Policy Implementation in Morocco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 47(5), 1-19.
  42. Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative Justice. Ideas, Values, Debates. London: Routledge.
  43. Kuru, D. (2019). Back at Home: The Ambassadors Conference as an Interstitial Practice. Global Affairs, 5(4-5), 295–313.
  44. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  45. Marshall, C. (2007). Terrorism, Religious Violence and Restorative Justice. In V. Ness & G. Johnstone (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
  46. Mothers for life. (2020). Nicola Benyahia: Available at: http://www.mothersforlife.org/en/keyparents/nicola-benyahiha.
  47. Neumann, P. et.al. (2007). Recruitment and Mobilisation for the Islamist Militant Movement in Europe. London: ICSR.
  48. Olson, J. & Sarver, R. S. (2021). How Restorative are You? Introducing the Restorative Index. Victims & Offenders, 17(6), 1-33.
  49. Onur, S. (2018). Challenges Post-Daesh Challenges for Europe, Horizon Insights.
  50. Parliamentary Assembly. (2016). Foreign Fighters in SyriaandIraq. at: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=22482&lang=en
  51. Parliamentary Assembly. (2018). Counter-narrativesto terrorism. Available at : https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=24810&lang=en.
  52. Plesch, V. & Haxhiaj, S. (2019). Kosovo is trying to reintegrate ISIL returnees. Will it work? Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2019/6/9/kosovo-is-trying-to-reintegrate-isil-returnees-will-it-work.
  53. Porter, L., & Kebbell, M. (2011). Radicalisation in Australia: Examining Australia’s Convicted Terrorists. Psychiatry. Psychology and Law. 18(2), 212-231.
  54. Puigvert, L. et.al. (2020). Grassroots community actors leading the way in the prevention of youth violent radicalization. PLoS ONE 15(10),1-29.
  55. Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2021). The potential of restorative justice in cases of violent extremism and terrorism. This document has been prepared for the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: The potential of restorative justice in cases of violent extremism and terrorism, 2021 (europa.eu).
  56. Ramos, M. (2019). El dique moral. Las víctimas del terrorismo como freno a la espiral de violencia. In A. Rivera Blanco (Ed.), Nunca hubo dos bandos: Violencia política en El País Vasco, 1975–2011 [There were never two sides. Political violence in the Basque Country 1975–2011].Comares. 175–198.
  57. Ríos, C. (2013). El encuentro personal entre quienes asesinaron perteneciendo a ETA y quienes sufrieron el horror injustificado, Descripción, análisis y reflexiones. IN E. Coord & P. Rodríguez, Los ojos del otro. Encuentros restaurativos entre víctimas y ex miembros de ETA. Santander: Salterrae, 187-224.
  58. Saltman, M. & Smith, M. (2015). Till Martyrdom Do Us Part. Gender and the ISIS Phenomenon. London: Institute for Strategic Dialogue. Available at: https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Till_Martyrdom_Do_Us_Part_Gender_and_the_ISIS_Phenomenon.pdf.
  59. Sarid, A., & Levanon, M. (2021). Rethinking the Theory of Communities of Practice in Education: Critical Reflection and Ethical Imagination. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 54(10), 1-12.
  60. Segovia, M. (2013). Los etarras arrepentidos Guisasola y Alza se unen a Mintegi y Urizar en el homenaje a Joseba Goikoetxea, El Mundo. Available at: https://www.elmundo.es/pais-vasco/2013/11/22/528f360663fd3dc00f8b456a.html.
  61. Sondarjee, M. (2020). Collective Learning at the Boundaries of Communities of Practice: Inclusive Policymaking at the World Bank.
  62. Sondarjee, M. (2021). We Are a Community of Practice, Not a Paradigm! How to Meaningfully Integrate Gender and Feminist Approaches in IR Syllabi. International Studies Perspectives. 23(3), 1-20.
  63. Soto, Tamara Martínez. (2021). Justicia restaurativa como sistema complementario al proceso penal. hacia una reparación integral a las víctimas del terrorismo. lecciones aprendidas desde la experiencia en España, Revista de Victimología, Núm(12), 111-136.
  64. Stephens, G. (2021). It’s because of community meeting: toward a responsive reconceptualization of social emotional learning. Educational Action Research. 31(2), 1-18.
  65. Sultan, O., Biffi, E & Cebrián, P. (2020). Reintegration of ISIS Returnees: A Myth or Reality? Beyond the Horizon ISSG Head Office, at: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/desktop/irua
  66. Suzuki, M., & Jenkins, T. (2020). The role of (self-)forgiveness in restorative justice: Linking restorative justice to desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 19(2), 1-18.
  67. Uğur, O. (2018). What Comes After ISIS: A Sociological Analysis of Radicalisation into Violent Extremism, Horizon Insights: Available at: https://behorizon.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/HORIZON-INSIGHTS-JOURNAL-Volume-1-Issue-1.pdf.
  68. United Nations. (2017). Security Council. S/RES/2396.
  69. United Nations. Office of Counter-Terrorism. (2017). Enhancing the Understanding of the Foreign Terrorist Fighters Phenomenon in Syria, at: https://f-origin.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/2725/files/2018/02/ONU_Report_Final_2017.pdf
  70. Vaandering, D. (2013). A window on relationships: Reflecting critically on a current restorative justice theory. Restorative Justice. 1(3), 311–333.
  71. Volpe, R. (2007). Restorative Justice in Post- Disaster Situations: Untapped Potential. Cardozoj. Conflct Resolution, 8(2), 611-621.
  72. Walgrave, L. (2015). Domestic Terrorism: A Challenge for Restorative Justice. Restorative Justice. An International Journal, 3(2), 282–290.
  73. Walgrave, L., Ward, T. & Zinsstag, E. (2021). When restorative justice meets the Good Lives Model: Contributing to a criminology of trust. European Journal of Criminology, 18(3), 444-460.
  74. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  75. Wenger, E., McDermott, A. & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press.
  76. White, M. (1989). The externalisation of the problem and the re-authoring of relationships. In M. White (Ed.), Selected papers Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications. 5-28.
  77. Wong, W., and Gavrielides, T. (2019). Restorative Justice in Educational Settings and Policies: Bridging the East and West, London: RJ4All Publications.
  78. Wood, S. (2021). Local Grounding of Transnational Private Governance Authority: Translation, Contestation, Legitimation and Communities of Practice. New Political Economy, 240-256.
  79. Zernova, M. (2019). Restorative justice in the aftermath of politically-motivated violence: the Basque experience. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(4), 649-672.