فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی

فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی

مطالعه تطبیقی راهبرد دولت‌های ایالات متحده آمریکا نسبت به منطقه آسیا-اقیانوسیه (2022-2009)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل

نویسندگان
سجاد عطازاده 1
مهدی فاخری 2
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
2 دانشیارگروه دیپلماسی و سازمانهای بین المللی، دانشکده روابط بین الملل وزارت امور خارجه، تهران، ایران
10.22034/isj.2024.404827.2033
چکیده
افزایش توان نظامی و توسعه سریع اقتصادی کشورهای منطقه آسیا- اقیانوسیه سبب شده است تا تعداد بسیار زیادی از متخصصان روابط بین‌الملل بر این عقیده باشند که آینده جهان در این منطقه تعیین خواهد شد. در این میان ایالات‌متحده سعی نموده است تا با اتخاذ راهبردهای گوناگون جایگاه خود را در منطقه آسیا-اقیانوسیه حفظ کرده و بهبود بخشیده و در عین حال مانع از خیزش رقبای خود گردد. پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و منابع کتابخانه‌ای در پی پاسخ به این سؤال است که «چه نقاط اشتراک و افتراقی در موضع‌گیری‌ دولت‌های مختلف آمریکا نسبت به منطقه آسیا-پاسفیک در حدفاصل سال‌های 2009 تا 2022 وجود دارد؟» یافته‌های تحقیق حاکی از آن است که در سیاست خارجی سه دولت اوباما، ترامپ و بایدن بیش‌تر از اختلاف و انقطاع شاهد تداوم هستیم؛ به علاوه، هر سه دولت نسبت به اهمیت و خیزش منطقه آسیا-اقیانوسیه واقف بوده و نسبت به آن توجه بسیار داشته‌اند. از سوی دیگر آنچه راهبرد دولت ترامپ را از راهبرد دولت‌های اوباما و بایدن نسبت به منطقه آسیا-اقیانوسیه جدا می‌کند، همکاری با متحدان و شرکا است، امری که در دوران ترامپ، برخلاف دوره‌های قبلی و بعدی کم‌رنگ‌تر شد؛ به‌طوری‌که می‌توان دولت بایدن را به‌نوعی دولت سوم اوباما در حوزه آسیا-اقیانوسیه دانست.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آسیا-پاسفیک
ایندو-پاسفیک
باراک اوباما
دونالد ترامپ
جو بایدن

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A Comparative Study of the Strategy of the United States' Administrations Towards Asia-Pacific (2009-2022)

نویسندگان English

Sajjad Atazade 1
Mehdi Fakheri 2
1 Ph.D. Student of Department of International Relations, Shahid Beheshti University,
2 Associate Professor, Dept. of Diplomacy and International Organizations School of International Relations Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The aggregation of the military power and the rapid economic development of the Asia-Pacific region have led a large number of international relations experts to reckon that the future of the world will be determined in Asia Pacific. In the meantime, the United States has tried to maintain and improve its position and also prevent the rise of its competitors in the Asia-Pacific by adopting various strategies. Using the descriptive-analytical method and library resources, the current research seeks to answer the question: "What are the points of commonality and difference in the positions of different American administrations towards the Asia-Pacific region between 2009 and 2022?" The findings indicate that in the foreign policy of the three administrations of Obama, Trump and Biden, there is more continuity than difference. In addition, all three administrations have been aware of the importance and rise of the Asia-Pacific region and paid much attention to it. On the other hand, what separates the strategy of the Trump administration from that of Obama and Biden ones towards the Asia-Pacific region is non-cooperation with allies and partners; that is cooperation became less prominent during the Trump era, unlike the previous and subsequent periods; thus, that the Biden administration can be seen as Obama's third administration in the Asia-Pacific region.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Asia-Pacific
Indo-Pacific
Barack Obama
Donald Trump
Joe Biden
  1. تابع افشار، ساناز، و برزگر، کیهان. (1395). رئالیسم نئوکلاسیک و سیاست خارجی آمریکا؛ تحلیلی نظری بر فهم سیاست خارجی ایالات متحده. رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، 8(1)، 70-42.
  2. جمشیدی، محمد، و یزدان‌شناس، زکیه (1399). استراتژی چرخش به آسیا؛ خیزش چین و سیاست امنیت ملی آمریکا در آسیا. دانش سیاسی، 16(1)، 91-116.
  3. شیخ‌الاسلامی، محمدحسن، و عطازاده، سجاد. (1401). آسیایی شدن: خوانشی جدید از نگاه به شرق. فصلنامه روابط خارجی، 14(4)، 37-68.
  4. فرهمند، محمدرضا، متقی، ابراهیم، و میرکوشش، امیرهوشنگ. (1400). رقابت هژمونیک آمریکا و چین و تاثیر آن بر جریان انرژی و نفت در جهان. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی، 18(1)، 103-120.
  5. یروزآبادی، سیدجلال. (1390). واقع‌گرایی نوکلاسیک و سیاست خارجی جمهوری ‏اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، 25(2)، 275-294.
  6. Auslin, M.R. (2018). The Question of American Strategy in the Indo-Pacific. Stanford: Hoover Institution.
  7. Bazoobandi, S. (2020). Asian Players: Risks and Chances from Middle Eastern Perspectives: The View From Iran. In V. T. Tramballi, Loking West: The Rise of Asia in the Middle East, Milan: ISPI.
  8. Berteau, D. J., Green, M. J., & Cooper, Z. (2014). Assesing the Asia-Pacific Rebalance. Washington: CSIS.
  9. Bolton, J. (2021). John Bolton on how a new era of American alliances is under way. Economist. September 22, Retrieved August 1, 2022, at: https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2021/09/22/john-bolton-on-how-a-new-era-of-american-alliances-is-under-way
  10. Brandon, J. J. (2020). Urgent Issues in U.S.-Southeast Asian Relations for 2021. San Francisco: Asia Foundation.
  11. Clinton, H. (2011). America’s Pacific Century, Foreign Policy. October 11, Retrieved October 30, 2021, at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/
  12. Cutler, W. (2021). America Must Return to the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Foreign Affairs. September 10, Retrieved October 30, 2021, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2021-09-10/america-must-return-trans-pacific-partnership
  13. Daniel F. Runde, R. B. (2018). The BUILD Act Has Passed: What’s Next?. CSIS. October 12, Retrieved November 4, 2021, at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/build-act-has-passed-whats-next
  14. Department of State. (2019). Free and Open Indo-Pacific : Advancing a Shared Vision. Washington: Department of States of United States of America.
  15. Detsch, J. (2021). How the U.S. Learned to Stop Worrying About the Pacific and Love the ‘Indo-Pacific’, Foreign Policy. July 30, Retrieved October 30, 2021, at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/07/30/biden-pacific-china/
  16. Dollar, D. (2019). China and the West competing over infrastructure in Southeast Asia. Washington: Brookings.
  17. Donnelly, J. (2011). In A. L.-S. Scott Burchill, Theories of International. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Ford, L. (2020). The Tump Administration and "the Free and Open Indo-Pacific”. Washington: Brookings.
  19. Gershman, J. (2002). Is Southeast Asia the Second Front?. Foreign Affairs, July 2, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2002-07-01/southeast-asia-second-front
  20. Glosserman, B. (2019). An Administration at War with Itself: The New US Strategy for the Indo-Pacific. In: Miracola, B., Geopolitics by Other Meanes: The Indo-Pacific Reality. Milan: ISPI, pp. 55-70.
  21. Gnanagurunathan, D. (2012). India and the idea of the ‘Indo-Pacific’. East Asia Forum, October 2012, Retrieved October 29, 2021, from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/10/20/india-and-the-idea-of-the-indo-pacific/
  22. Heydarian, R. J. (2022). Beyond Strategic Hype: Prospects for Biden’s Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. CHINA US Focus, , June 11, Retrieved August 1, 2022, from https://www.chinausfocus.com/finance-economy/beyond-strategic-hype-prospects-for-bidens-indo-pacific-economic-framework
  23. Jackson, V. (2023). The Problem with Primacy. Foreign Affairs, January 16, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/asia/problem-primacy
  24. Juster, K. I., Kumar, M., Cutler, W., & Forbes, N. (2022). It’s Time for America and India to Talk Trade. Foreign Affairs, April 14, Retrieved August 1, 2022, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/india/2022-04-14/its-time-america-and-india-talk-trade
  25. Kaplan, R. (2011). Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power. New York: Random House.
  26. Kausikan, B. (2022). Threading the Needle in Southeast Asia. Foreign Affairs, May 11, Retrieved August 1, 2022, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/southeast-asia/2022-05-11/threading-needle-southeast-asia
  27. Liff, Z. C. (2021). , Foreign Affairs. America Still Needs to Rebalance to Asia, August 11, Retrieved November 5, 2021, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2021-08-11/america-still-needs-rebalance-asia
  28. Obama, B. (2011). Remarks By President Obama to the Australian Parliament. The White House President Barack Obama, November 17, Retrieved November 4, 2021, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament
  29. Peter Petri, M. P. (2020). RCEP: A new trade agreement that will shape global economics and politics, Brookings. , November 16, Retrieved October 31, 2021, at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/11/16/rcep-a-new-trade-agreement-that-will-shape-global-economics-and-politics/
  30. Pitlo, L. B. (2022). IPEF: A New Addition to Southeast Asia’s Overlapping Economic Constellations. CHINA US Focus, June 30, Retrieved August 1, 2022, at://www.chinausfocus.com/finance-economy/ipef-a-new-addition-to-southeast-asias-overlapping-economic-constellations.
  31. Rao, N. (2021). Nirupama Rao on America’s need for wisdom and allies in Asia, Econimist, September 27, Retrieved November 5, 2021, at: https://www.economist.com/by-invitation/2021/09/27/nirupama-rao-on-americas-need-for-wisdom-and-allies-in-asia
  32. Schake, K. (2023). Biden’s Foreign Policy Is a Mess. Foreign Affairs, February 10, at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/biden-foreign-policy-mess.
  33. Shambaugh, D. (2020). The Southeast Asian Crucible. Foreign Affairs, December 17, Retrieved November 5, 2021, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/asia/2020-12-17/southeast-asian-crucible
  34. Stromseth, J. (2019). Don’t make us choose: Southeast Asia in the throes of US-China rivalry. Massachusetts: Brookings.
  35. Sverdrup-Thygeson, J., Lanteigne, M., & Sverdrup, U. (2016). “For Every Action...” The American pivot to Asia and fragmented European responses. Brookings, January 27, at: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/for-every-action-the-american-pivot-to-asia-and-fragmented-european-responses/
  36. Walt, S. (2021). The AUKUS Dominoes Are Just Starting to Fall. Foreign Policy, September 18, Retrieved November 5, 2021, at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/09/18/aukus-australia-united-states-submarines-china-really-means/
  37. White House. (2022). Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States, February, at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf
  38. William Alan Reinsch, L. M. (2019). At Last, An RCEP Deal. CSIS, December 3, Retrieved October 2021, 2021, at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/last-rcep-deal
  39. Yahuda, M. (2019). The International Politics of the Asia-Pacific. New York: Routledge.
  40. Zhenglong, W. (2022). The IPEF is a Bust. CHINA US Focus, June 15, Retrieved August 1, 2022, at: https://www.chinausfocus.com/finance-economy/the-ipef-is-a-bust