Politicization of Ethnic and Religious Identities from Perspective of Political Stability in Egypt after Arab Spring (2011–2022)

Document Type : Original Article from Result of Thesis

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in Political Science, Faculty of Law , Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor at Political Science Department , Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor at Political Science Department, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

"Identity politics" is among the prominent topics of novel sociology. In fact, the instances of identity politics include the politicization of ethnic, cultural, linguistic, and religious identities as well as the political activity and participation of ethnoreligious groups to pursue their desires, citizenship rights, and self-determination. The Middle East has emerged as the major focal point for terrorism and ethno-religious conflicts in recent decades. Egypt was among the first Arab states to undergo political and social changes following the onset of successive unrest and political movements in Arab states in 2011. Hence, the main research question is as follows: “What are the most important sociological and domestic factors affecting the politicization of ethnic and religious identities in post-Arab Spring Egypt?” To address this questions, a descriptive-analytical method was employed. According to the findings, the causes of ethnic and religious identity politicization in Egypt are directly related to the “political stability” of this African country. Due to a relatively strong civil society, Egypt managed to go through the transition stage and make progress in various indicators such as political stability, plurality of parties, unemployment rate, inflation rate, and poverty rate. Nevertheless, the lack of consensus on national identity, disruption in the stable transfer of power, and the deep and broad scope of the army's activities still remain the obstacles to successful political stability in Egypt.

Highlights

Introduction

Classified as a major topic in new sociology, identity politics refers to the politicization of ethnic, cultural, linguistic, and religious identities and political action and participation by ethnoreligious groups to pursue their needs, ensure their citizenship rights, and determine their destiny. In the past several decades, the Middle East has become the focal point of terrorism and ethnoreligious violence. When the dominoes of the Arab Spring started to fall in 2011, Egypt was among the first Arab states to experience political and social changes. The post-Arab Spring politicization of ethnoreligious identities in Egypt has ensued from various amplifying factors. 1) Economic inequality: The growingly unequal distribution of resources and economic opportunities among different social groups could prompt some to strengthen their ethnoreligious identity for more power and influence over these resources. 2) Lack of consensus in explaining the national identity: Disagreement in the exact definition of Egypt’s national identity could have prompted some to strengthen their ethnoreligious identity by benefiting from the lack of an exact definition of national identity. 3) Disruption in the stable transfer of power: Egypt was in a transitional phase after the Arab Spring. While a new political system was being established, there could be disruptions in the stable transfer of power leading some groups and individuals to strengthen their ethnoreligious identity for more power and influence. The main research question concerns the most important sociological and internal reasons and factors affecting and intensifying the politicization of ethnoreligious identities in post-Arab Spring Egypt.

 

Research Methodology

This study employs a descriptive-analytical methodology.

 

Findings

The findings indicate that the reasons for the politicization of ethnoreligious identities are directly related to the “political stability” of this African country. With a relatively robust civil society, Egypt successfully passed the transition period and improved political stability, number of parties, and unemployment, inflation, and poverty rate and other indicators after the revolution. Despite these advancements, the disagreement in describing the national identity, disruption in the stable transfer of power, and the expansion of the army’s operations are still the obstacles to political stability in Egypt. Economic growth is a complex process influenced by various factors. With respect to Egypt, factors such as the economic crisis, inflation, unemployment, corruption, generation gap, and rural-to-urban migration have played key roles in the formation of political events such as the revolution. Moreover, the highly growing population and the necessity of meeting its needs are major challenges to the political elites in Egypt. Furthermore, political events in Egypt could indicate structural deficiencies in its governance and political system. Regarding structural deficiencies in Egypt’s governance and political system, Mubarak’s administration managed to achieve good economic growth in Egypt by controlling the media and eliminating any political rivals. However, the corruption and elimination of any political rivals damaged the political system and led to public frustration. Meanwhile, the lack of financial resources in much of the society exacerbated economic inequality. After the fall of Mubarak’s administration and the dawn of revolution in Egypt, the political system experienced uncertainty and instability. There were several transitional governments in this period, none of which could communicate with the public properly and address economic and social woes. Therefore, with an unstable political system and lack of financial resources in much of the society, Egypt faces massive challenges in development and economic growth. Hence, the national development of Egypt requires the long-term and enduring cooperative efforts of the political and economic elites.

 

Results

Regardless of the type of political regime and development, many countries have been concerned about political unrest and instability in recent decades. In fact, political conflicts can significantly affect how countries function, and there is always a reciprocal relationship between political stability and economic performance. Moreover, political instability affects the business environment and economic policies, with the biggest damage to the political stability being the loss of social welfare and the lowering of living standards. However, economic factors such as the rise in unemployment and inflation rates and the reduction in economic growth also affect the political stability of different countries. Various regimes can also reach political stability through political legitimacy or coercion, and the political legitimacy of governments leads to the establishment of democracy and rapid economic growth. At the same time, the resistance of governments to political changes can lead to political instability and slow down or can stop economic growth. Nevertheless, countries such as Egypt have different degrees of political instability. Stability has been an important and fundamental challenge of Egyptian states from Nassar to Mubarak, and after the 2011 Arab Spring, from Morsi to El-Sisi. However, political stability has been elusive not only in Egypt but in the entire Middle East due to the lack of historical, social, economic, and political prerequisites. Although post-Arab Spring Egypt improved different indicators such as political stability, number of parties, unemployment, inflation, and poverty rate, and access to the Internet, the country still suffers from political instability. Some challenges still remain due to the lack of promising conditions. These challenges include low public trust, excessive government control over the media, and continuous legislative reforms to limit privacy, the legitimacy of National Elections Commissions, and obstacles to freedom of expression. Generally, political instability can have widespread economic consequences in every country. In fact, it is essential to adopt a comprehensively political and economic approach to address the problem. Such an approach should include bolstering political legitimacy, improving transparency and social recognition of legislative reforms, promoting sustainable economic development, and ensuring social mobility. Achieving this goal requires the cooperative efforts of the state, society, and the private sector.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abu Talebi, F. (2011). Examining the role of civil society in Middle East developments. International Peace Studies Center, July 19, at: http://www.peace-ipsc.org/fa (In Persian)
  2. Aghazadi, M. (2013). Fears and hopes in the Egyptian army. Tabayin Strategic Think Tank, at: http://tabyincenter.irindex.php.menu-examples/child-items-5 (In Persian)
  3. Alishahi, A., Masoudnia, H., & Forouzan, Y. (2020). The Transition to the Second Wave of the Revolution; An Analysis of the Performance of the Authoritarian Government of Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in Post-Morsi Egypt. Political Studies of Islamic World9(3), 73-96. doi: 10.30479/psiw.2020.13790.2846 (In Persian)
  4. Ayubi, N.H. (1989). Government and the state in Egypt today, in Charles Tripp and Roger Owen (eds). Egypt under Mubarak, New York: Routledge.
  5. Barden, H. (2011). Arab Society Power Transactions Locally and Multilaterally. In Forum for Democratic Global Governance, Stockholm.at: http://mdgfund.org/node/5332
  6. Beinin, J. (2012). The Rise of Egypt's Workers. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, June, at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/egypt_labor.pdf
  7. Ehteshami, A., Murphy, E. (1996). Transfomatin of the Corporatist State in the Middle East, Third World Quarterly, 17(4), 753-772.
  8. El-Hamidi, F., & Wahba, J. (2005). The effects of structural adjustment on youth unemployment in Egypt. 12th Annual Conference of the Econimic Research Froum (ERF), at: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/5760/
  9. Eltaweel, H. (2012). Civil Society in the Arab World: Case Study of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Middle East Studies Center-The American University in Cairo, Decmber.
  10. Erikson, D. (2011). Rational Choice Theory: Potential and Limits, 11th edition, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Etaat, J., & Karimi, H. (2021). Geopolitical Analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood Failure in Egypt. Geopolitics Quarterly17(62), 149-181. (In Persian)
  12. Etling, B., Kelly, J., Faris, R., & Palfrey, J. (2010). Mapping the Arabic blogosphere: Politics and dissent online. New media & Society, 12(8), 1225-1243.
  13. Fawad Abdullah, S. (2022). Party activity in Egypt. Translated by Majid Najjar. Middle East Studies, Special Issue, 51-56. (In Persian)
  14. Feirahi, D., & askari sadr, A. (2018). The Reasons of Ekhvan ol- Moslemin’s Failure after the Downfall of Mubarak. Political Science21(Issue 82), 99-126. doi: 10.22081/psq.2018.66177 (In Persian)
  15. Glassman, J.K., & Glickman, D. (2011). Strategic Public Diplomacy: The Case of Egypt. National Security Project, October.
  16. Goldstone, J.A. (2011). Understanding the Revolutions of 2011. Foreign Affairs, April 14, at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/middle-east/2011-04-14/understanding-revolutions-2011
  17. Hamidi, P. (2011). The role of social networks in the Egyptian revolution. Tehran: Al-Mustafa Society Publishing Center. (In Persian)
  18. Hawthorne, A. (2004). Middle Eastern Democracy: Is Civil Society the Answer?. Carnegie Endowment for International PeaCe, March 1, at: https://carnegieendowment.org/2004/03/01/middle-eastern-democracy-is-civil-society-answer-pub-1463
  19. Herati, M.J., & Zafari, M. (2013). The difference between the role and position of the army in the process of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the developments of 2011 in Egypt, Research Journal of the Islamic Revolution, 3(8), 139-155. (In Persian)
  20. Herati, M.J., and Mohammadi, R. (2019). Testability of Crane Brinton's theory in the revolutionary developments of Tunisia and Egypt. Islamic Revolution Studies, 16(56), 115-130. (In Persian)
  21. Hinnebusch Jr, R. A. (1988). Egyptian politics under Sadat: The Post-Populist Development of an Authoritarian-modernizing State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Imam Jomehzadeh, S. J., & Heshmati, A. (2015). Nation - State Failed in Egypt. Political and International Approaches5(3), 119-147. (In Persian)
  23. Khanzade, A. (2021). Egypt 8 years after the coup; Positive achievements or ruthless policies?. IRNA, July 5, at: https://irna.ir/xjFmw6 (In Persian)
  24. Khorasani, R., & Amani, Z. (2022). The Quiddity of Deep State in Middle East; Case Study: Deep State in Turkey and Egypt. Political and International Approaches13(2), 147-173. doi: 10.29252/piaj.2022.226025.1207 (In Persian)
  25. Kinnimont, J, (2012), Bread, Dignity and Social Justice: The Political Economy of Egypt's Transition, Briefing Paper of Chatham House, April, at: https://opendata.uni-halle.de/bitstream/1981185920/109335/41/718566386.pdf
  26. Korotayev, A., & Zinkina, J. (2011). Egyptian Revolution: A Demographic Structural Analysis.  Revista Interdisciplinar, 13(2011), 139-169.
  27. Köse, T., Özcan, M., & Karakoç, E. (2016). A comparative analysis of soft power in the MENA region: The impact of ethnic, sectarian, and religious identity on soft power in Iraq and Egypt. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(3), 354-373.
  28. Lord, K. M., & Sharp, T. (Eds.). (2011). America's Cyber Future: Security and Prosperity in the Information Age. CNAS, May 31, at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/americas-cyber-future-security-and-prosperity-in-the-information-age
  29. Makhsoudi, M. and Heydari, Sh. (2011). Examining the similarities and differences of the Arab movements in the Middle East countries. Policy Guidance, 2(4), 41-73. (In Persian)
  30. Malaekeh, S.H., & Hosseini, S.M. (2016). The Cause of Brotherhood from the Beginning to Today, Translated by Sayyed Hadi Khosroshahi, Tehran: Center for Diplomacy Documentation and History. (In Persian)
  31. Mokhtari, A., Akvani, H., Ghasemi, J., & Malekifar, M. (2022). A Contemplation on the Fragility and Continuity of Government in Egypt from 1980 to 2020. Journal of Political Socology of Islamic World10(20), 111-136. doi: 10.22070/iws.2022.15233.2132 (In Persian)
  32. Motallebi, M. (2017). Recognizing the Role and Status of Military in the Political and Social Developments in Egypt, before and after the Fall of Morsi's Government. Journal of Political Socology of Islamic World, 5(10), 103-126. doi: 10.22070/iws.2018.1892.1349 (In Persian)
  33. Naseri, S., and Asadi, A. (2013). Analyzing the role of the new middle class in the Egyptian social movement. Foreign Relations, 4(4), 197-234. (In Persian)
  34. Osman, T. (2011). Egypt on the Brinkfrom Naser to Mubarak, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  35. Otari, M. (2007). Transition to democracy or quasi-authoritarianism. Translated by Saeed Mirtrabi, Tehran: Qoms Publishing. (In Persian)
  36. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World, 5(1), 52-76. (In Persian)
  37. Sajedi A, & Ranjbar R. (2015). The Egyptian Military’s Role and Position in the July 2011 Revolution Developments. (In Persian)
  38. Shakibaei, M. (2011). Streamology of Egyptian Parties (8): Hizb Al-Khadir Al-Mesri. Qodsna, April 22, at: http://qodsna.com/fa/155625/print (In Persian)
  39. Sheykhol Eslami, M. H., Ghahramani, M., & Gharibi, M. (2019). The failure of the democratic process in Egypt after the 2011 revolution, from the point of view of Ajamoglu-Robinson theory. International Relations Researches, 9(2), 161-186. doi: 10.22034/irr.2019.101053 (In Persian)
  40. The Fund for Peace. (2016). Fragile States Index. at: http://fsi.fundforpeace.org/
  41. Zibaei, M. (2018). The Sffects of 2011 Uprisings over the State in the Arab Middle East. State Studies4(14), 37-68. doi: 10.22054/tssq.2018.9074 (In Persian)