Document Type : Original Article from Result of Thesis
Authors
1 PhD Student of Public Law Department,, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan , Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, University of Isfahan
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract
Highlights
Introduction
The modern Westphalian state has now become the modern rights-based state in response to the norms of human rights. Regarding the requirements of the globalized era, it has to erode in favor of transnational institutions and global governance. According to the writers, the integration of these three entities will finally form the rights-based global state (i.e., the unity of humanity under a common political power committed to the norms of human rights), as different philosophers (e.g., Zheng and Vannette) have described the global state as inevitable. In the current anarchic nation-state order (i.e., the political order without the presence of any superior institution and based on the equilibrium of forces), the human rights cannot be implemented maximally due to the absence of a superior regulator or supervisor with a balancing power as well as constant and pervasive structural inequalities on a global scale (both domestically and internationally). Presenting an eschatological framework for the nation-state anarchy, Vannette argued that the global state would not be free of a Hegelian structure and would depend on the identification of all activists characterized by the features of a Weberian state (with the exclusive use of legitimate force and violence) through the control of conflicts and international coordination (i.e., a Kantian state). According to Vannette, this is the only ultimate and favorable outcome for the nation-state anarchy. Based on the above hypotheses, the formation of a rights-based global state will not be far-fetched in the future and has been used as a presumption by the authors to raise the main research question. What capabilities will a rights-based global state have in the maximal implementation of human rights? The research hypothesis is the maximal implementation of human rights in the light of unique features of this aspect of a global state. This study aims to explain the capabilities of this public state with the quality of being rights-based (i.e., the final version of a pervasive state) within the area of human rights for its three separate generations.
Methodology
In this paper, a descriptive-analytical approach was employed to collect the topics regarding a nation state and the features of this state in relation to the norms of human rights by reviewing 34 up-to-date scientific references such as reputable papers and books. The features were then described and analyzed to extract the necessary results and findings to address the main research questions.
Findings
The idea of political integrity has been presented as different forms throughout history. Instances include the formation a global empire under the reign of a unified church in the ideas of Aquinas in the Middle Ages, the formation of a utopia consisting of all human beings and communities on Earth in the ideas of Islamic philosophers such as Al-Farabi and Mulla Sasdra, the belief of Grossius in the necessity of forming a global state to implement international laws, and the support of ISA for the empowerment of the United Nations and other interstate organizations towards a “global government”.
Regarding the maximal implementation of the first generation of human rights (i.e., civil laws, political laws, and social laws), the pervasive rights-based state innately adopts the negative rights approach guaranteeing the maximal implementation of this generation of human rights due to minimal emergence and occurrence as well as termination of national governances. In fact, establishing a global nation means eliminating antihuman unity tools, terminating geographical and ideological borders and unreal distances between humans, implementing the wisdom-driven human unity scheme, identifying all people as global citizens, maintaining human dignity based on the right to destiny, and preserving the interests of all humans. These features will lead to the maximal implementation of the first generation of human rights.
Regarding the maximal implementation of the second generation of human rights (i.e., economic and welfare laws), a pervasive state can provide humans with their welfare rights for a satisfactory life by distributing welfare among the people of the world, eliminating poverty, granting access to global wealth, and using the chance to divide the peaks of wealth into the faults of poverty in the world. The global state should have the following capabilities for the maximal implementation of this generation of human rights: reducing the health-threatening factors worldwide, providing the public health and care services, separating health from opportunistic business, eliminating educational discriminations, constraints, and bans, and realizing educational freedom.
Regarding the maximal implementation of human rights solidarity (i.e., the third generation of human rights), the following goals will be feasible only through the formation of a pervasive state: the philosophy of territorial wars, domestic armed conflicts for the acquisition of power or international armed conflicts to the development or conquer of power, production and accumulation of arms, separatism, and discrimination of minorities based often of territorial and geographical conflicts. The cancelation of realization of the final anarchy status, emergence of a global regulator to maintain the equilibrium of systemic forces, and the public sustainable peace will all emerge in a collective life based on the public common good. It is now feasible to protect the world and the Earth to have a healthy ongoing life only through global unity achieved by an executive legislative institution. The global state will bear the highest guarantee of implementation due to its integrated governance to manage and run the common human legacy appropriately as a common asset to fairly distribute this public wealth.
Results
The authors assumed the realization of a level of a global state to achieve high goals of human rights in order to analyze the capabilities and attractions of this state for the maximal implementation of human rights. The appropriate form of a pervasive government, which we consider the rights-based global state, can guarantee human life and security by preserving personal freedom and improving citizenship quality in the global community through the establishment of a collective security system, mutual correlation and identification of states and humans, and social-religious pluralism. The global state implements the first generation of human rights through an often negative rights approach. It also guarantees the maximal implementation of the second generation of human rights by identifying and mobilizing public economic facilities and distributing the wealth of Earth fairly based on the needs of global citizens (i.e., globally distributive justice) through a positive rights approach. Since it has a collectivism nature, it also guarantees the implementation of the third generation of human rights by objectifying the solidarity right and identifying the requirements to collective life of humans. With its unique features, a global state is a definitive solution to human-related problems such as war and development of mass destruction weapons, poverty and global inequality, pandemics, and environmental destruction. Accordingly, the research hypothesis regarding the maximal implementation of human rights will be proven through the capabilities of a global state. Establishing a legitimately global political authority within the norms of human rights can be considered the main approach to the global government of human rights and universality of its values (i.e., objective human rights for all, everywhere, and always).
Keywords
Main Subjects