Right to Health and US Sanctions under Trump against Islamic Republic of Iran (Sanctions on Drugs and Medical Equipment)

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Doctoral student of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Since the end of World War II, global developments have driven the world to expand collaborations. In addition to providing various solutions to peace, the Charter of the United Nations has made an extensive reference to the “human rights” and transformed this term into a discourse, the global compliance with which can be considered an important factor in the public acceptance of a country. This term has gained so much importance that all international mechanisms should be developed accordingly. In this regard, specific frameworks have been defined for sanctions in the UN laws, and the Charter of the United Nations will explicitly revoke the sanctions that violate the human rights. Conversely, the US has deprived Iran of both political and economic relations and obstructed its right to purchase drugs and medical equipment by imposing unilateral sanctions against this country. This paper aims to analyze the effects of the US sanctions on the violation of Iranian people’s right to health. For this purpose, a descriptive-analytical approach is employed to determine what impacts the US sanctions have had on Iranian people’s health in pharmaceutical and medical areas. Although drugs and medical equipment are officially considered humanitarian items and should not be sanctioned, the research findings indicate that the US has imposed unilateral sanctions on these items. Hence, it has violated the international laws and human rights, thereby adversely affecting Iranian people’s right to health.

Highlights

Introduction

The scopes of sanctions have been defined in the laws of the United Nations. In fact, the Charter of the United Nations will clearly revoke the sanctions that violate the human rights. However, the US has imposed unilateral sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Reducing the petroleum revenues of the IRI, these sanctions have led to the violation of the human rights. Since Iran earns its revenues mainly from the sales and export of petroleum, the unilateral US sanctions against Iran have decreased these revenues. In other words, the US has obstructed the economic ways of purchasing drugs, pharmaceutical raw materials, and medical equipment, something which has violated Iranian people’s right to health. In this regard, the human rights have clearly been violated as a result of the unilateral US sanctions against Iranians which have caused the deficiency of drugs, depreciation of medical equipment, decline of people’s purchase power, and increase in diseases.

Previous studies have analyzed the effects of the US sanctions on different areas. However, this study aims to address the impacts of sanctions on patients with special, rare, and pervasive diseases by considering the deficiency of drugs and medical equipment.

In this study, a documentary desk method was adopted to collect the necessary references. The study was then conducted through a descriptive-analytical method.

Although pharmaceutical products and medical equipment are officially considered humanitarian items and cannot be sanctioned, the US has imposed unilateral sanctions to reduce Iran’s revenues. As a result, drugs and medical equipment have been limited and depreciated in Iran; hence, Iranian people’s rights have been violated.

 

Methodology

Persian and English books, papers, and documents were reviewed in this study to analyze the concept of sanctions, especially the unilateral US sanctions imposed against the IRI in different historical periods. Finally, the status quo of patients with special, rare, and pervasive diseases was analyzed to determine the areas in which their right to health would be violated in the IRI.

Regarding the theoretical research framework, although the general discourse about the US foreign policy is always stated in liberalism, this country often acts practically in realism and speaks the language of power.

Given the offensive US policies such as Trump’s decision to exit the JCPOA and then impose unilateral sanctions against Iran, the offensive realism theory can be emphasized. In fact, Trump exerted pressure on Iran to maintain the US hegemony against China and Russia and improve the US security in the chaotic region.

 

Results and Discussion

Since Iran earns its export revenues mainly from the petroleum sales, this country has faced a dramatic reduction in revenues due to the unilateral US sanctions. For instance, the IRI soled much smaller amounts of petroleum in 2020 than in the first year after the Islamic Revolution (1980).

According to the research literature, the sanction policies formulated by the Trump administration have left large-scale impacts on five main areas of financing, purchasing and importing goods, manufacturing domestic products, and storing and distributing drugs. In particular, these sanctions have resulted in the deficiency of drugs for nearly six million patients with special and rare diseases. The sanctions have also paralyzed Iran’s pharmaceutical industry and disrupted the production of generic drugs. In other words, Iran has resorted to purchasing drugs or pharmaceutical raw materials of lower or suspicious quality from China and India instead of reputable American or European companies.

None of the punishments against the IRI forbids the export of humanitarian goods such as drugs and medical equipment directly. However, these sanctions have had adverse and indirect effects on people’s hygiene, welfare, and access to such services. In fact, the US has apparently exempted drugs from sanctions but prevents the sales of drugs and medical equipment with dual applications. It is also practically impossible to import other items due to financial constraints and obstructions.

Sanctions can definitely affect people’s livelihood when they are imposed by powerful countries. If these sanctions are as pervasive as the unilateral US sanctions against the IRI, they can violate the innocent people’s right to life. In fact, the right to life does not only mean the animal life or the plant life. It requires all the necessary tools for having a well-deserved human life. In such an intellectual framework, inhuman humiliating punishments are forbidden.

 

Conclusion

The unilateral US sanctions against the IRI, especially the maximum pressure policy adopted by Trump’s administration, have drastically declined Iran’s petroleum revenues and reduced Iranian people’s purchase power. As a result, it is now impossible to import drugs from reputable pharmaceutical companies. Another outcome is the depreciation of medical equipment. In fact, international pharmaceutical companies and banks all over the world are unwilling to conduct transactions with Iran due to secondary sanctions and difficulties in receiving money. This issue has played a key role in the deficiency of drugs and depreciation of medical equipment, something which has directly affected the health of Iranian citizens and has deprived them of their absolute right to health.

Overall, the unilateral US sanctions against the IRI under Trump’s administration have declined the living standards and reduced the quality of life in Iran, thereby violating the right to health.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Abbasi, M., Hamidfar, H. (2020). The alliance of Saudi Arabia and Israel with the United States and its consequences on the balance of power and influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Middle East. International studies journal (ISJ), 17(67), 7-25. (In Persian)
  2. Al Jazeera (2010). Iraq prime minister to visit Iran. Al Jazeera, September 09, at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2006/9/10/iraq-prime-ministers-iran-visit-delayed.
  3. Alikhani, M. (2020). A study of Trump's strategy of maximum pressure on Iran from the perspective of coercive power. International studies journal (ISJ), 17(65), 63-86. (In Persian)
  4. Alishahi, A., Forouzan, Y. (2019). The nature of Trump's offensive strategies against the Islamic Republic of Iran; Roots and consequences of security and military. Scientific Journal of Defense Policy, 27(106), 85-112. (In Persian)
  5. Ammirati, A. (2020). Chronic Kidney Disease. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 66(1), 3-9, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.66.S1.3.
  6. Barnes, J., Barron, R. (2018). Trump Policy in the Middle East: Iran. Rice University`s Baker Institute for Public Policy, Issue Brief, March 23, at: https://www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/d47f4b2c/bi-brief-032318-cme-iran.pdf.
  7. Bastani, P., Dehghan, Z., Kashfi, SM., Dorosti, H., Mohammadpour, M., Mehralian, GH. (2022). Challenge of Politico-Economic Sanctions on Pharmaceutical Procurement in Iran: A Qualitative Study. Iran J Med Sci, 47(2), 152-161.
  8. Borak, D., Gaouette, N. (2019). US officially reimposes all sanctions lifted under 2015 Iran nuclear deal. CNN, November 05, at: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/05/politics/iran-sanctions/index.html. 
  9. Brower, C., Jason, D. (1998). The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. Online.
  10. Cheng, T., Kim, S., Koh, K. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Singapore. Institute of Labor Economics, ISSN: 2365-9793.
  11. Corr, C. (2007). A New Normal Life on Dialysis, the First 90 Days. New York: National Kidney Foundation.
  12. Darj, H., Basiri, M. (2019). Analysis of the Trump administration's approach to the nuclear case of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientific Journal of Security Horizons, 12(43), 75-113. (In Persian)
  13. Dehghani Firoozabadi, J. (1998). The theory of neoliberal institutionalism and international cooperation. Journal of Foreign Policy, 12(3), 567-588. (In Persian)
  14. Ebhome (2021). Know about EB Home; The non-profit organization. Ebhome, April 09, at: www.ebhome.ngo/about. (In Persian)
  15. Erlanger, S. (2020). Biden Wants to Rejoin Iran Nuclear Deal, but It Wont Be Easy. The New York Times, November 17, at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/world/middleeast/iran-biden-trump-nuclear-sanctions.html
  16. Evans, T. (2002). A human right to health. Third World Quarterly, 23(2), 197-215. DOI: 10.1080/01436590220126595.
  17. Farsnews (2021). Hemophilia patients should inject plasma instead of factor 9! / When the Food and Drug Administration recommends going back 50 years. Fars News Agency, Nowember 17, at: www.farsnews.ir/news/14000825000774/. (In Persian)
  18. Forrer, J. (2017). Economic Sanctions; Sharpening a Vital Foreign Policy Tool. Atlantic Council, at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Economic_Sanctions_web_0614.pdf
  19. France 24 (2020). Sanctions-hit Iran struggles to make cancer drugs. France 24, March 02, at: https://www.france24.com/en/20200302-sanctions-hit-iran-struggles-to-make-cancer-drugs
  20. France 24 (2019). John Bolton’s dangerous 'obsession' with Iran. France 24, May 24, at: https://www.france24.com/en/20190524-john-bolton-nuclear-iran-military-trump-usa-ayatollah-khamenei
  21. Franchini, M., Mannucci, P. (2104). The History of Hemophilia. Semin Thromp Hemost, 40(05), 571- 576.
  22. Fulbright, A. (2018). In recording, Netanyahu boasts Israel convinced Trump to quit Iran nuclear deal. at: https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-recording-netanyahu-boasts-israel-convinced-trump-to-quit-iran-nuclear-deal/
  23. Ganeei, M. (1998). Talassemia and ways to prevent it. Journal of the Foundation for Special Diseases, 1(1), 30-31. (In Persian)
  24. Ghanbarloo, A. (2018). Theoretical basis of sanctions related to Iran's nuclear program: a comparison of diplomacy between the Trump and Obama administrations. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies, 21(2), 75-100. (In Persian)
  25. Gorji, A. (2014). Sanctions against Iran: The Impact on Health Services. Iran Journal of Public Health, 43(3).
  26. Haltiwanger, J. (2021). Here's what's in the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran that Trump abandoned and Biden is vying to restore. at: https://www.businessinsider.com/iran-nuclear-deal-explained
  27. Hosseini, E., Mahmoudi, M., Masoudi, I., Karami, B. (2020). A Short Review on the Model of Government Support Programs for Special Patients in Iran, United Kingdom, United States of America, Italy, and Sweden. Galen Medical Journal, 9, e1403, 1-14. DOI:10.31661/gmj.v0i0.1403.
  28. Ilieva, J., Dashtevski, A., Kokotovic, F. (2018). Economic Sanction in International Law. UTMS Journal of Economics, 9(2), 201-211.
  29. Ilna (2021). From reducing the life of thalassemias to 30 years to the migration of hemophiliacs to Tehran and the cost of 5 million per month for an MS patient. Iranian Labour News Agency, Jaunuary 25, at: https://adr3.ir/ilna. (In Persian)
  30. Irna (2021). Expensive medicine is one of the main problems of dialysis patients in Zanjan. The Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA), November 23, at: www.irna.ir/news/84550963/. (In Persian)
  31. Karimi Fard, H. (2018). Trump's foreign policy and the realities of the international system. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies and Public Policy, 8(28), 285-302. (In Persian)
  32. Katzman, K. (2020). Iran Sanctions (PDF). Congressional Research Service, 1-91.
  33. Khalaf, A. (2019). American attitude towards Iran and its reflection on Iran policy toward the Arab region. Review of Economics and Political Science, DOI: 10.1108/REPS-09-2019-0119.
  34. Laudati, D., Pesaran, H. (2021). Identifying the Effects of Sanctions on the Iranian Economy Using Newspaper Coverage. CESifo Working Paper, No. 9217, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898315.
  35. Mahmoodi, A. (2020). Lack of hygiene against pandemic diseases (especially corona) from the perspective of jurisprudence and law. Islamic Law Quarterly, 17(64), 197-224. (In Persian)
  36. Massoumi, R., Koduri, S. (2015). Adverse effects of political sanctions on the health care system in Iran. J Glob Health, 5(2).
  37. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W.Norton & Company.
  38. Medpip (2020). World Rare Disease Day; More common than previously thought. Medpip, February 29, at: https://adr3.ir/3gJ. (In Persian)
  39. Mehrnews (2018). Take a look at the problems of kidney patients; Kidney patients in the challenge of providing expensive medications. Mehrnews, August20, at: www.mehrnews.com/news/4378353/. (In Persian)
  40. Mirtaher, R. (2015). About the Comprehensive Joint Action Plan. Report of the Political-Legal Deputy of the Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Design number 14399. (In Persian)
  41. Mosavi, F., Jokar, F., Mohammadi, A. (2014). US unilateral sanctions against Iran: contradictions in speech and action and politicization of human rights. Journal of Public Law Research, 16(44), 149-173. (In Persian)
  42. Naghshbandi, A., Dehshiri, MR., Keshishiansiraki, G., Ghaedi, MR. (2021). Political and economic consequences of the US withdrawal from the JCPOA for Iran during the Trump era and the beginning of the Biden era. International studies journal (ISJ), 17(67), 157-176. (In Persian)
  43. Navidian, A., Arbabi, A., Keykhaei, A. (2006). Frequency of psychological problems of hemodialysis patients referred to the dialysis ward of Khatam Al-Anbia Hospital in Zahedan. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, 15(58), 61-67. (In Persian)
  44. Nephew, R. (2018). The Art of Sanctions. New York: Columbia University Press.
  45. Pope, E., Lara, I., Deeb, M. (2004). Epidermolysis Bullosa; A Handbook for EB Patients and Families, Canada: University of Toronto.
  46. Treasury (2020). Executive Order 13382—Blocking Property of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferators and Their Supporters (PDF). Treasury, May 18, at: www.treasury.gov
  47. Radoir (2021). List of rare diseases. at: https://radoir.org/fa/. (In Persian)
  48. Rahmani, Sh., Jafari, A. (2019). Confrontation of unilateralism and the rule of law in international law; A case study of US sanctions against Iran. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in the Islamic World, 9(4), 53-71. (In Persian)
  49. Reuters (2018). U.S. withdraws from international accords, says U.N. world court 'politicized. Reuters, October 04, at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-diplomacy-treaty-idUSKCN1MD2CP.
  50. Rosenberg, E., Goldman, Z., Drezner, D., Solomon-Strauss, J. (2016). The New Tools of Economic Warfare Effects and Effectiveness of Contemporary U.S. Financial Sanctions. Center for a New American Security. at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/the-new-tools-of-economic-warfare-effects-and-effectiveness-of-contemporary-u-s-financial-sanctions.
  51. Sajjadpour, K., Amini, A. (2020). Opinions of the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on the effects of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 34(2),5-37. (In Persian)
  52. Setayesh, S., Mackey, T. (2016). Addressing the impact of economic sanctions on Iranian drug shortages in the joint comprehensive plan of action: promoting access to medicines and health diplomacy. Globalization and Health, 12(31), DOI 10.1186/s12992-016-0168-6.
  53. Seyedtaghizadeh, H., Reisi, L., Esmaeili, B. (2019). Examining the legitimacy of US unilateral sanctions following the withdrawal from the UN Security Council under the UN Charter. Quarterly Journal of International Relations Studies, 12(47), 39-70. (In Persian)
  54. Syndifarma (2021). Investigate the problems of the pharmaceutical industry by focusing on the shortage of raw materials needed to produce drugs. The Syndicate of Iranian Pharmaceutical Industries, July 25, at: Syndipharma.org/?p=501692. (In Persian)
  55. The Hindu (2013). Tehran is changing, pity about DC. The Hindu, Chennai, India. August 09. at: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/tehran-is-changing-pity-about-dc/article5004096.ece.
  56. The Independent (2018). Trump signs order reimposing sanctions on Iran - a move the EU said it deeply regrets. The Independent, August 06, at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/iran-sanctions-trump-us-eu-nuclear-deal-trade-executive-order-latest-a8479806.html.
  57. The Scientist (2004). US Reverses Journal Embargo, The Scientist, April 07, at: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-analysis/us-reverses-journal-embargo-50250.
  58. Toebes, B., Ferguson, R., Markovic, M., Nnamuchi, O. (2014). The Right to Health. The Hague: Asser Press.
  59. UNICEF (2021). What you need to know about corona vaccines. Unicef for every child, June 06, at: https://yun.ir/3d1m15.
  60. Who (2021). Coronavirus disease. World Health Organization, May 19, at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_1.
  61. Wong, D. (2007). Wong`s nursing care of infants and children, Translated by Mahnaz Shoghi and Mahnaz Sanjari, Tehran: Jamenegar and Salemi Pub, 8th (In Persian)
  62. Yjc (2021). Statistics of special and incurable patients in the country / budget of 120 billion Tomans in 1400. Young Journalists Club (Yjc), May 08, at: www.yjc.news/fa/news/7750665/. (In Persian)
  63. Yjc (2012). Dialysis patients talk about their problems. Young Journalists Club (Yjc), December 04, at: www.yjc.news/fa/news/4181326/. (In Persian)
  64. Zamani, G., Mazaheri, J. (2011). Intelligent Security Council sanctions in the light of Resolution 1929: Maintaining or threatening peace. International Law Journal, 28(44), 115-161. (In Persian)
  65. Zengerle, P. (2016). Extension of Iran Sanctions Act passes U.S. Congress. Reuters, at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-usa-sanctions-idUSKBN13Q5JW.