The USA and the Challenge of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Diplomacy and International Organizations School of International Relations Tehran, Iran

Abstract

WTO is an international regime which regulates the trade policies of its member states. Trade dispute among members are referred to Dispute Settlement Body, whose efficiency has been recognized by its members and other international organizations. Nevertheless, the Appellate Body’s adjudications have recently been contested by US, paralyzing its functions by blocking the nomination of new judges. The objective of this research is to know the roots and possible implications of the crisis. The methodology is descriptive-analytical and findings like countries’ approaches, DSB impact on fair trade, consequences of US position, existing proposals and prediction of future situation will be discussed. The innovation of the research is the analysis of scenarios which might reform the international trade system. The outcome of the research is that although the American position is affected by its interpretation of the jurisprudence of DSB/AB, but it is also highly motivated by US interpretation of the WTO principle of universalism, believing that Appellate Body is acting beyond the agreed terms in Uruguay Round and its modus vivendi needs to be modified. However, the uniform support of all members toward WTO Appellate Body might complicate US achievement this time.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Azadbakht, F. (2019). The Language of International Law, Monologue or Polyphonic Test. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 15(4), 19-30. (In Persian)
  2. Chang-fa, L., Nakagawa, J., Tsai-Fang, C. (2019). The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform, Tokyo, Springer.
  3. Davey, W.J. (2015). The First Years of WTO Dispute Settlement: Dealing with Controversy and Building Confidence, in A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO (G. Marceau, Ed.) Cambridge University Press.
  4. De Vries, H. (1997). International Commercial Arbitration. Translated by Mohebi, M. International Law Review, 15(21), 43-70, doi: 10.22066/CILAMAG.1998.18176 (In Persian)
  5. Dietz, J.P. (1979). Introduction: Development of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 27(2-3), 449-552, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/840045
  6. Fiorini, M., Hoekman, B., Mavroidis, P.C., Saluste, M., Wolfe, R. (2019). WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body Crisis: Insider Perceptions and Members’ Revealed Preferences, Geneva, Bertelsmann Stiftung Working Paper.
  7. Ghanbari, S. (2019). The Concept of International Society and Attempt to Link International Law and International Relations. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 16(1), 7-30. (In Persian)
  8. Hillmann, J.A. (2020). A Reset of the World Trade Organization's Appellate Body. Greenberg Centre for Geoeconomic Studies, available at:
  9. https://www.cfr.org/report/reset-world-trade-organizations-appellate-body
  10. Hoekman, B. Mavroidis, P. (2018). Party like it’s 1995: Resolving the WTO Appellate Body Crisis, Geneva, WTO.
  11. https://worldtradelaw.net/databases/basicfigures.php (2017), 5 May.
  12. https://www.investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/isds (2019).
  13. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm (2019).
  14. Johnson, k. (2019). How Trump May Finally Kill the WTO. Foreign Policy, available at: https://www.foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/09/trump-may-kill-wto-finally-appellate-body-world-trade-organization/
  15. Khadkhodaie, A.A., Abbedini, A. (2012). The Features of WTO Self-containedness in International Legal System. International Law Review, 29(46), 8-34, doi: 10.22066/CILAMAG.2012.16559 (In Persian)
  16. Reich, A. (2017). The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis. EUI Department of Law Research Paper No. 2017/11, Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law Research, 1-18.
  17. Reinsch, W. A. (2019), Salvaging the World Trade Organization, CSIS, available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/salvaging-world-trade-organization
  18. Schneider, A. K. (1999). Getting Along: The Evolution of Dispute Resolution Regimes in International Trade Organizations. 20 MICH. J. INT'L L. 697. Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol20/iss4/3
  19. Van den Bossche, P., Zdouc, W. (2013). The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics