International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

The Cairo Conference of 1921 as a Process of Imperial Policymaking: The Role of Britain’s Middle Bureaucratic Stratum in the Middle East

Document Type : Original Article from Result of Thesis

Authors
1 Department of International Relations, Faculty of Theology, Law, and Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 Full Professor, Faculty of International Relations, MFA
10.22034/isj.2026.583568.2463
Abstract
This article examines the process of British imperial policymaking in the Middle East after the First World War, with particular emphasis on the 1921 Cairo Conference. The central concern of the study is to explain how British political decisions were formulated and how administrative structures contributed to the creation of new systems of governance in Iraq, Transjordan, and Palestine. More specifically, the article seeks to answer the question of how imperial bureaucratic networks and mid-level officials shaped the decision-making process and influenced the formulation of British policy in the region.

Employing a historical-analytical approach and a three-level analytical framework, the study explores the interaction between the structural constraints of the British Empire, intermediate bureaucratic networks, and the agency of key actors. The findings demonstrate that political officers, Colonial Office administrators, and regional experts played a significant role in shaping policy options and guiding decision-making processes through the production, collection, and transmission of field-based knowledge concerning local conditions. In this context, the Cairo Conference served as a crucial arena in which these policy alternatives were consolidated and translated into concrete arrangements of governance across Britain's newly acquired territories.

The article argues that the governance structures that emerged in Iraq, Transjordan, and Palestine were less the product of a coherent grand design for a new Middle Eastern order than the outcome of bureaucratic efforts to establish cost-effective, practical, and administratively manageable forms of imperial rule under the constraints of the post-war environment.
Keywords
Subjects

1.      Allawi, A. A. (2014). Faisal I of Iraq. Yale University Press.
2.      Bell, G. (1921, March). [Letter/Memorandum on Faisal’s Candidacy]. Gertrude Bell Papers. Gertrude Bell Archive, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
3.      Bernhardsson, M. (2005). Reclaiming a plundered past: Archaeology and nation building in modern Iraq. University of Texas Press.
4.      British Government. (1922, June). British White Paper of June 1922 [White paper]. Avalon Project, Yale Law School. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/21st_century/brwh1922.asp
5.      Busch, B. C. (1976). Britain, India, and the Arabs: 1914–1921. University of California Press.
6.      Checkel, J. T. (1998). The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics, 50(2), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008093
7.      Colonial Office. (1921). Iraq: Original Correspondence (CO 730/1). The National Archives, Kew, United Kingdom.
8.      Cox, P. (1921). Report on Iraq Administration (CO 730/1). The National Archives, Kew, United Kingdom.
9.      Dodge, T. (2003). Inventing Iraq: The failure of nation building and a history denied. Columbia University Press.
10.   Faught, C. B. (2022). Cairo 1921: Ten days that made the Middle East. Yale University Press.
11.   Fromkin, D. (2009). A peace to end all peace: The fall of the Ottoman Empire and the creation of the modern Middle East (20th anniversary ed.). Henry Holt and Company. (Original work published 1989)
12.   George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
13.   Gregg, B. (2022). Imperial strategy and the Cairo Conference of 1921. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 50(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2021.1994383
14.   Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
15.   House of Commons Debates. (1921, June 14). Middle Eastern Services. Vol. 143, cols. 265–320
16.   Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
17.   Hughes, M. (2013). Britain’s pacification of Iraq: The British Army, the Royal Air Force and the revolt of 1920. Cambridge University Press.
18.   Kedourie, E. (1970). England and the Middle East: The destruction of the Ottoman Empire 1914–1921. Mansell.
19.   Kleiman, A. S. (1970). Foundations of British policy in the Arab world: The Cairo Conference of 1921. Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.   Louis, W. R. (1984). The British Empire in the Middle East, 1945–1951: Arab nationalism, the United States, and postwar imperialism. Oxford University Press.
21.   Lawrence, T. E. (1921, February). Mesopotamia: Memorandum by Mr. T. E. Lawrence (CAB 24/120, CP 2562). The National Archives, Kew, United Kingdom
22.   Omissi, D. (1990). Air power and colonial control: The Royal Air Force 1919–1939. Manchester University Press.
23.   Paris, T. (2003). Britain, the Hashemites and Arab rule: The Sherifian solution. Routledge.
24.   Porath, Y. (1974). The emergence of the Palestinian-Arab national movement, 1918–1929. Frank Cass.
25.   Reguer, S. (2020). Winston S. Churchill and the shaping of the Middle East, 1919–1922. Academic Studies Press.
26.   Satia, P. (2006). Developing Iraq: British knowledge, expertise and the transformation of the Middle East. The Journal of Modern History. 78(3), 576–608. https://doi.org/10.1086/508001
27.   Segev, T. (2000). One Palestine, complete: Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate. Metropolitan Books.
28.   The National Archives. (1921). Cairo Conference Papers (CAB 24/122). Cabinet Office Records, Kew, United Kingdom.