International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Ontological Contradictions of Human Rights in Hannah Arendt’s Political Thought: From the Aporia of Statelessness to the Redefinition of the Right to Have Rights

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Political Thought in Islam, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute
2 Department of Political Thought, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute
10.22034/isj.2025.564964.2418
Abstract
in recent decades, Hannah Arendt’s perspective on human rights has increasingly attracted attention in philosophical and political scholarship. Extensive studies from various angles—ranging from political philosophy to postcolonial theory—have critically examined Arendt’s understanding of human rights. This article, adopting a conceptual-philosophical and ethical-anthropological approach, seeks to provide a comprehensive reinterpretation and reconstruction of Arendt’s critique of human rights. The central research question is why Arendt fundamentally opposed the conventional concept of human rights, and how this opposition can be understood within the broader context of her intellectual framework. According to the analysis presented, Arendt’s critique of human rights is ontologically rooted: modern human rights, constructed upon the abstraction of the human subject, collapse in the face of twentieth-century historical experiences—particularly statelessness and displacement. Only through a return to the true meaning of politics—as the sphere of action, freedom, plurality, and the manifestation of human beings in the shared world—can fundamental human rights be effectively defended. The research employs an analytical-descriptive methodology, relying on conceptual, phenomenological analysis and close readings of
Keywords

Subjects



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 26 December 2025