International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Redefining the Objective Foundations of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Cultural Diplomacy in India

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Author
Ph.D. of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science,, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University ,Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Abstract

In the post – Cold War world, cultural diplomacy has become a key instrument of the foreign - policy apparatus of modern nation - states, serving to influence nations — alongside governments — through culture, identity, art, values, and norms. Iran and India, as two modern nation - states with shared racial, cultural, and identity roots, have not succeeded in establishing a balanced relational interaction. Accordingly, this study seeks to identify which foundations and components play an objective role in redefining and constructing such a relational interaction. The research hypothesis posits that the historical – civilizational, religious – ethical, and scientific – cultural – artistic foundations can be effectively applied within the cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. These encompass components such as the Persian language, shared scientific and literary figures, architecture, the Muslim community (particularly the Shiites), and extensive historical–civilizational ties. This applied study employs a mixed - methods approach (quantitative – qualitative), documentary research, and soft - power theory to analyze the subject
Keywords
Subjects

1.     Ahmadi Dehka, R. (2018). Principles of cultural diplomacy and its place in foreign policy of countries. Adiban Rooz. (In Persian)
2.     Ahmadi, S. J., et al. (2024a). Analysis of the practical components of the cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in India. Subcontinental Studies16(47), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.22111/JSR.2023.45881.2361 (In Persian)
3.     Ahmadi, S. J., et al. (2024b). Diaspora; Component and tool of cultural diplomacy. International Studies21(1), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.22034/ISJ.2024405598.2036 (In Persian)
4.     Alkatheeri, A. R., & Khan, M. (2019). A perspective on Saudi soft power and cultural diplomacy. Global Social Sciences ReviewIV(II), 20–26.
5.     Ang, I., Isar, Y. R., & Mar, P. (2015). Cultural diplomacy: Beyond the national interest? International Journal of Cultural Policy21(4), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1042474
6.     Aukia, J. (2019). Struggling for recognition? Strategic disrespect in China’s pursuit of soft power. East Asia36(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-019-09323-9
7.     Bajenaru, I. R. (2022). Bangtan Boys (BTS) – Part of South Korea’s cultural diplomacy and soft power strategy. Political Sciences and International Relations BucharestXIX(1), 156–180.
8.     Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2017). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations (7th ed., pp. 1–14). Oxford University Press.
9.     Becard, S. R. S., & Menechelli Filho, P. (2019). Chinese cultural diplomacy: Instruments in China’s strategy for international insertion in the 21st century. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional62(1), e005. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201900105
10.  Bell, E. C. (2022). Understanding soft power discourse in the National Library of Australia. Journal of Documentation78(7), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2021-0231
11.  Bell, E. C., & Kennan, M. A. (2022). The library as soft power actor: A review. IFLA Journal48(4), 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211054111
12.  Cooper, A. F., Heine, J., & Thakur, R. (2013). Introduction: The challenges of 21st-century diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy (pp. 1–38). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0001
13.  Cull, N. J. (2022). From soft power to reputational security: Rethinking public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy for a dangerous age. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 18(1), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00236-0
14.  Dubinsky, Y. (2022). The Olympic Games, nation branding, and public diplomacy in a post-pandemic world: Reflections on Tokyo 2020 and beyond. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00255-x
15.  Ghorbani Golshanabad, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Components of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran [In Persian]. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Revolution Studies, 14(50), 27–44.
16.  Gil, J. (2015). China’s cultural projection: A discussion of the Confucius Institutes. China: An International Journal, 13(1), 200–226.
17.  Goff, P. M. (2013). Cultural diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy (pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588862.013.0024
18.  Hartig, F. (2016). How China understands public diplomacy: The importance of national image for national interests. International Studies, 18(4), 655–680.
19.  Holden, J. (2013). Influence and attraction: Culture and the race for soft power in the 21st century. Demos.
20.  Kim, H. (2017). Bridging the theoretical gap between public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 15(2), 293–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2017.08.15.2.293
21.  Luke, C., & Kersel, M. M. (2016). U.S. cultural diplomacy and archaeology: Soft power hard heritage. Future Anterior, 13(1), 140–146.
22.  McClory, J. (2015). The soft power 30: A global ranking of soft power. Portland Communications. https://softpower30.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/The_Soft_Power_30_Report_2015-1.pdf
23.  Rajabi, M., & Asari, A. R. (2021). Resources, goals and tools of cultural diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran [In Persian]. Soft Power Studies, 11(2), 105–123.
24.  Salehi Amiri, S. R., & Mohammadi, S. (2010). Cultural diplomacy [In Persian]. Qoghnous.
25.  Sheludiakova, N., Koval, O., & Sokolova, K. (2021). Communicating the foreign policy strategy: On instruments and means of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine. SHS Web of Conferences, 100, 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110002005
26.  Smith, G. S. (2019). Transatlantic cultural relations, soft power, and the role of US cultural diplomacy in Europe. European Foreign Affairs Review, 24(1), 1–20.
27.  Soleimanipourlak, F. (2013). Soft power in America's Middle East strategy. Strategic Studies Research Institute. (In Persian)
28.  Thussu, D. K. (2018). Globalization of the Chinese media: The global context. In D. K. Thussu, H. de Burgh, & A. Shi (Eds.), China’s media go global (pp. 17–33). Routledge.
29.  Topić, M., & Sciortino, C. (2012). Cultural diplomacy and cultural imperialism: A framework for the analysis. Introduction study. In M. Topić & S. Rodin (Eds.), Cultural diplomacy and cultural imperialism: European perspective(s) (pp. 9–49). Peter Lang.
30.  Zaharna, R. S., Arsenault, A., & Fisher, A. (Eds.). (2013). Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift. Routledge.
31.  Zamorano, M. M. (2016). Reframing cultural diplomacy: The instrumentalization of culture under the soft power theory. Culture Unbound, 8, 166–186. http://www.culture-unbound.ep.liu.se
32.  Zolfaghari, M., & Dashti, F. (2018). Components and capacities of soft power of the Islamic Republic of Iran in cultural diplomacy [In Persian]. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Soft Power Studies, 8(19), 127–153.