International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Legal Capacity to Implement Non-binding Security Council Resolution 2250 on the Role of Youth in Peacebuilding

Document Type : Original Article from Result of Thesis

Authors
1 MA Student, International Law Dep., Faculty of Theology, Law and Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran.
Abstract
The Security Council, as one of the principal organs of the United Nations, bears the primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security, and, in this regard,it is empowered under ChapterVII of the UN Charter to adopt binding resolutions applicable to other member states of the United Nations.However, according to the UN Charter as the founding instrument, the Security Council does not possess a general mandate with respect to all aspects of peace.Out of respect for the sovereignty of other member states and in order to prevent the attribution of additional privileges or rights to this organ, no implicit powers should be presumed.As a political organ, the Council may only adopt resolutions within the scope of the mandate explicitly delegated by the member states of the United Nations.Peace comprises three dimensions:peacemaking,peacekeeping,and peacebuilding.The central question addressed in this article is how the credibility of non-binding Security Council resolutions can be maintained in the context of peacebuilding.Based on a descriptive-analytical approach, the findings of this study indicate that the Security Council may issue binding resolutions solely in the first 2dimensions.In matters of peacebuilding, it may only issue recommendations.Therefore, Resolution2250—concerning the role of youth in international peace and security—is non-binding and thus serves only as a declaratory and advisory resolution for member states.Drawing on principles of international law—particularly the doctrine of the Responsibility to Protect and the principle of self-determination—it proposes a conceptual and legal framework for safeguarding the legitimacy of youth-related resolutions.In doing so,it revives overlooked legal capacities for implementing non-binding instruments.
Keywords
Subjects

1.      Abdollahi, M., Hosseini, R. (2023). Realization of the right to self-determination in the framework of R2P. Journal of Public Law Research, (25)80, 136-170. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2023.69476.2815  (In Persian)
2.      A/RES/70/262 (2016) . 12 May At: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_262.pdf
3.      A/RES/60/1 (2005). 24 October At: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf
4.      A/RES/78/257 (2023). 28 December At: https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/78/257
5.      A/RES/40/14 (1985). 18 November At: https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/40/14
6.      A/55/305-S/2000/809 (2000). 21 August At: https://docs.un.org/en/A/55/305
7.      Anderson, I. (2019). Youth, peace and security: A qualitative analysis of UNSCR 2250 and the international response to a new security agenda. Reprosentralen, Universitetet I Oslo. At: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/70674/1/Youth--Peace-and-Securiy.pdf
8.      Beigzadeh, E. (2023). International law: Subordinate relations. Mizan Publication. (In Persian)
9.      Berents, H. (2024).  Institutionalising a radical vision: The idea of youth, and the Youth, Peace and Security agenda. Youth and sustainable peacebuilding. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526176219.00017
10.   Berents, H. (2022). Power, Partnership, and Youth as Norm Entrepreneurs: Getting to UN Security Council Resolution 2250 on Youth, Peace, and Security. Global Studies Quarterly, 1-11.
11.   Cahill-Ripley, A., Hendrick, D. (2018). Economic, social and cultural rights and sustaining peace: an introduction. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Quaker United Nations Office, and Lancaster University. At: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/genf/14400.pdf
12.   Charter of the united nations
13.   Dawson, G. (2004). Peacekeeping, peacebuilding, and peacemaking: concepts, complications, and Canada’s role. Parliamentary Research Branch Library of Parliament. At: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection-R/LoPBdP/EB-e/prb0406-e.pdf
14.   Falsafi, H. (2022). Perpetual peace and rule of law. Nashre Now Publication. (In Persian)
15.   Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, (6)3.
16.   Gawerc, M. (2006). Peace-building: theoretical concrete perspectives. Peace & Change. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0130.2006.00387.x
17.   Harland, D. (2018). The lost art of peacemaking. Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. At: https://www.hdcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/The-lost-art-of-peacemaking.pdf
18.   Hosseini, S., Najafi Asfad, M., Alipour, M. (2024). The criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of UN peacekeeping operations. Public Law Studies Quarterly, (54)3, 1847-1865. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2022.332006.2913 (In Persian)
19.   International covenant on civil and political rights
20.   Najandimanesh, H., Mohammadi, K., Shamlou, S. (2024). The position of the concept of the doctrine of responsibility to protect in the principles and foundations of the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran with an emphasis on administrative law. Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law, 265-289. Doi: 10.22034/MRAL.2023.1989883.1437 At: https://www.malr.ir/article_704573.html?lang=en (In Persian)
21.   Mousazadeh, R., Hoseinzadeh, S. (2020). The assessment of the practice of the UN security council on the use of R2P. Public Law Quaterly,50, 465-490. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2019.283950.2058 (In Persian)
22.   Ozcelik, A., Nesterova, Y., Young, G., Maxwell, A. (2021). Youth-led peace: The role of youth in peace processes. University of Glasgow. At: https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/242178/2/242178.pdf
23.   Report of the secretary-general’s high-level panel on threats,challenges and change. (2004). A more secure world: Our shared responsibility. United Nations. At: https://www.un.org/peacebuilding/sites/www.un.org.peacebuilding/files/documents/hlp_more_secure_world.pdf
24.   Rajabi, S., Mir Abbasi, B., Salahi, S. (2022). Review veto prosedures in the UN security council. Legal Research Quaterely, (25)99, 11-40. Doi:10.29252/JLR.2022.221941.1911 (In Persian)
25.   S/RES/1645 (2005). 20 December At: https://docs.un.org/en/S/RES/1645(2005)
26.   S/PV.7573 (2015). 9 December At: https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.7573
27.   Shahmirzaei, A. (2023). International organizations. Modaresan Sharif Publication. (In Persian)
28.   Stradiotto, L. (2024). Youth, peace and security.  At: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385738202_YOUTH_PEACE_AND_SECURITY
29.   The UN Secretary-General’s (1992). Agenda for Peace report. At: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/145749?v=pdf
30.   UN Peacebuilding support office. (2010). UN peacebuilding: an orientation. United Nations. At: https://www.un.org/peacebuilding/sites/www.un.org.peacebuilding/files/documents/peacebuilding_orientation.pdf