International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

The Novel and World Peace: The Contributions of a Literary Genre

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Author
Mansour Ansari
Assistant professor and member of the academic staff of Imam Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution Research Institute.
10.22034/isj.2025.380496.2296
Abstract
Kant, in *Perpetual Peace*, argued that global peace must become an achievable goal; otherwise, human affairs will remain in disorder, and morality and human rights will not be fully realized. However, he and many later philosophers acknowledged the immense challenges of attaining such an aspiration. World peace resembles Camus' Sisyphus, who endlessly rolls a boulder uphill—an arduous yet essential task.Peace is more than political institutions; it is a cultural mindset, a way of seeing global issues. It is nurtured through culture and art, whose long-term influence shapes societies. This study explores how the novel, as a literary genre, fosters a mindset of peace, particularly world peace. By its nature, the novel is a genre of dialogue, openness, and empathy. Drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin’s literary theory, this research argues that the novel encourages pluralism and understanding, essential for peacebuilding Through its descriptive-explanatory approach, the study demonstrates that literature—especially the novel—creates spaces for diverse voices, promoting tolerance and coexistence. In this way, novels serve not only as artistic expressions but also as catalysts for a culture of peace.

Highlights

Introduction

     One of the most important questions of political thought has always been what is the relationship between domestic politics and international politics; One of the philosophers who entered this theoretical debate and in fact he can be considered one of the founders of this issue is Immanuel Kant. Kant's answer to the problem of the relationship between domestic politics and international politics by researchers and commentators of international relations theories is mainly placed in the category of idealism, and it is subject to the same criticisms that are generally on idealism. In this article, while rereading Kant's theory and his philosophical response to the relationship between international politics and domestic politics, we try to show that in some of the later theories such as the critical theory of international relations or the approach of the international community An attempt has been made to first provide a non-idealist explanation and interpretation of Kant's idea, and secondly, by reconstructing his views, they use his main idea in their own theoretical form. Contrary to realism and idealism, which are dogmatic and non-static, international critical theory is open, open and dynamic. In addition, in terms of political thought, Kant's theory was more in line with democratic political thoughts, which today are called the supporters of deep democracy, dialogic democracy or deliberative democracy, and the final victory of the democratic world depends on the application of the principles and Democratic rules are known to the international arena (see: Ansari, 2005).

 

Theoretical foundations: the idea of perpetual peace

As one of the famous philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment, Kant started writing separate treatises in the field of thought and political philosophy very late. His most important work in this regard is his treatise on perpetual peace, which, according to Gallie, was supposed to create a great "Copernican revolution" in political philosophy, along with Kant's theoretical philosophy (Gallie, 1372: 24); (Gallie, 1993: 24).

 

perpetual peace in the framework of Kantian philosophy

According to Kant, the worst evil of human societies is war; He even considers war as the source of all evils and moral corruption (Gallie, 1372: 34); (Gallie, 1993: 34). In this sense, war was an acute form of a common evil in human nature, which must first be curbed by the implementation of laws and then cured by moving towards civil status.

 

Internal politics: Republic and perpetual peace

In the first article of his Treatise on perpetual Peace, Kant clearly states that perpetual peace is possible only when governments have a specific political organization; Kant follows his discussion about political organization by emphasizing the type of constitution. Hannah Arendt points out in the speeches about Kant's political philosophy that Kant distanced himself from concepts such as history and human socialization and focused his attention on the constitution and the constitution of the republic. as the best type of government (Arendt, 1982: 15).

 

International politics

In his famous treatise Philosophical Project Towards perpetual Peace, he mentions the formation of a "federation of free countries". international governments" has used (Mahmoudi, 1385:142); (Mahmoudi, 2006: 142). Contrary to the view of some of its commentators, the concept of federation does not mean "super-state". By no means does it mean "universal republic" or even "federal government".

 

Rereading the idea of perpetual peace: moving away from the duality of realism and idealism

Kant's idea of lasting peace has been criticized mostly by the theory of realism in international relations. Realism extends the duality between ethics and politics to the distinction between domestic politics and international politics. Although it is possible through the law, moral progress can be made in the field of domestic politics, but the field of international relations remains fundamentally and inherently immoral. Idealism, as another important tradition in the field of international relations, believes that domestic politics and international politics can and should be analyzed in terms of common concepts and approaches. Therefore, in agreement with Kant, it is believed that like domestic politics, international politics can also be charged with reason.

1- Critical theory of international relations

In the critical theory of international relations, realism is based on maintaining a certain type of power politics and also preventing other ways of thinking about the world. According to them, realism ultimately serves the interests of those who benefit from the world as it exists; Realism has actually distorted the world by eliminating any possibility of change. At the same time, the critical theory of international relations makes sharp criticisms towards the theory of idealism; The idealist approach to politics is fundamentally ahistorical (see: Hutchings, 1996: 23-35).

2- The approach of the international community

The approach of the international community, in contrast to the realists who try to separate domestic politics from international politics, strongly believe that any attempt for such a separation is useless and impossible. Therefore, the behavior of governments cannot be limited to observable and measurable factors, and therefore, the relationship between governments should not be evaluated solely on the basis of the struggle for power, but these relationships are based on a set of right. And commitments are firm (Ghavam, 2004: 5: 198-202).

 

Conclusion

As we discussed in detail, Kant's idea of perpetual peace was raised as a controversial project from the very beginning. Kant himself, unlike many of his commentators, did not see perpetual peace as a project that must be designed and implemented step by step, but according to Karl Jaspers, it was not an essential principle but a regulatory principle that mankind should Consider it as a kind of human mission for yourself. Also, in his treatise, Kant was able to show the relationship between domestic politics and international politics, which although great schools such as realism or even idealism tried to ignore it, but over time, it became the focus of the theory. has been placed later. Two critical theories of international relations as well as the approach of the international community, in opposition to the approach of the international system, have tried to in the light of the fundamental transformations that have taken place not only in politics but also in culture and global communication. has taken, to use the idea of perpetual peace in more up-to-date areas. Therefore, in a sense, it can be said that Kant's idea of perpetual peace reveals the possibility of rethinking the international order, especially the relationship between domestic politics and international politics, and the future theories cannot respond to This ratio will open new theoretical windows.

 

Keywords
Novel"
World Peace"
Literary Genre"
Mikhail Bakhtin"
"
Theory of Mind"

Subjects

  1. Abrams, M. H. (2012). A Glossary of Literary Terms. 10th ed., Cengage Learning.
  2. Ansari, Mansour (2005). Discursive Democracy: Democratic Possibilities of the Thoughts of Mikhail Bakhtin and Jürgen Habermas, Tehran: Nashre-Markaz. (In Persian)
  3. Ansari, Mansour (2023), Imagination, Utopia, and Political Philosophy, Jameh-Pazhouhi Farhangi Quarterly, Volume 14, Issue 1 (Serial 47). (In Persian)
  4. Ansari, Mansour (2023). Perpetual Peace in Kant's Political Thought: Rereading the Relationship between Domestic Politics and International Politics. Internnational Studies Journal (ISJ), 3(75), 61-80. (In Persian)
  5. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. University of Texas Press.
  6. Barrère, J.-P., & Martuccelli, E. (2019). Sociologie : De la théorie à la pratique. Éditions du Seuil.
  7. Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. Oxford University Press.
  8. Boulding, Elis. (2000). Cultures of peace: The hidden side of history. Syracuse University Press.
  9. Doe, Jane. (2015). Narratives for Peace: The Impact of Storytelling on Conflict Resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(7), 1201-1226.
  10. Eisenberg, N., & Strayer, J. (1987). Empathy and Its Development. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396-403.
  12. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
  13. Harris, P. L. (1992). From simulation to folk psychology: The development of a theory of mind. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7(3), 321-334.
  14. Hollan, D., & Throop, C. J. (2008). "Whatever Happened to Empathy?" Ethos, 36(4), 385-401.
  15. Hutchinson, F. (2001). Kant’s Ethical Philosophy and the Problem of Peace. Philosophical Quarterly, 51(2), 258-276.
  16. Lukács, Georg. (1983). The Historical Novel. Translated by Hannah Mitchell and Stanley Mitchell, University of Nebraska Press.
  17. Moses, M. V. (1995). The novel and the globalization of culture. Oxford University Press.
  18. Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: Cultural diversity and political theory. Harvard University Press.
  19. Parekh, B. (2006). Multiculturalism and the remaking of political theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526.
  21. Rallo-Ditche, Élisabeth. (2010). Littérature et sciences humaines. Auxerre, France: Éditions Sciences Humaines.
  22. Rylance, Christopher. (2016). Reading and the Making of Time in the Eighteenth Century.
  23. Sidney, Philip. (2002). An Apology for Poetry. Edited by Geoffrey Shepherd, Manchester University Press.
  24. Smith, John. (2010). Literature as a Tool for Peace: Exploring the Role of Fiction in Promoting Cross-Cultural Understanding. International Journal of Peace Studies, 15(2), 45-60.
  25. Steinberg, Shirley R. (Ed.). (2009). Diversity and multiculturalism: A reader. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
  26. The Arbinger Institute. (2006). The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  27. Llosa, Mario. (2006). Why Literature? Translated by Abdollah Kowsari. Tehran: Lohe Fekr. (In Persian)
  28. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
  29. Watt, Ian. (1957). The Rise of the Novel. University of California Press.