International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Economic Implications of Iran’s Designation on the FATF Blacklist

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
1 MA in international relations from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Ph.D. Student in International Relations of Kharazmi University
Abstract
Established in 1989, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an international body responsible for overseeing issues related to money laundering and terrorist financing. Its mandate includes preventing money laundering, the financing of terrorism, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The FATF has formulated 40 recommendations that states seeking membership are required to adopt and implement. To date, more than 200 countries and international organizations have formally committed to adhering to the standards established by the FATF. Iran has remained on the FATF blacklist since 2009 due to its continued failure to enact legislation aimed at combating transnational organized crime and terrorist financing. This study seeks to answer the question of what economic repercussions Iran faces as a result of being placed on the FATF blacklist. The proposed hypothesis is that inclusion on this blacklist results in financial restrictions and economic problems. An analytical approach is used to test the research hypothesis. Findings indicate that inclusion on the FATF blacklist is associated with restrictions on banking transactions, a decline in international prestige, and a subsequent decrease in foreign investment, reduced economic growth, currency fluctuations, and increased inflation.

Highlights

Introduction

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an intergovernmental organization founded in 1989 to address money laundering. This international organization has since broadened its scope to include the financing of terrorism, corruption, piracy, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The FATF establishes international standards through 40 recommendations, requiring states to align their legislation with these guidelines. Iran initiated legal actions to combat money laundering in the 2000s; however, the FATF designated it as a non-cooperative state in 2009. Following the JCPOA in 2015, Iran was granted a one-year timeframe to enact the requisite legislative measures. Nevertheless, the absence of definitive ratification led to its reclassification in 2019. The most recent FATF plenary in 2024 also affirmed this situation. Although the FATF recommendations are not legally binding, the compliance of industrialized countries with these standards suggests that non-cooperation with the FATF can lead to significant financial and economic repercussions. The primary research question of this study is: What are the economic repercussions of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s inclusion on the FATF blacklist? The proposed hypothesis is that inclusion on the FATF blacklist results in financial restrictions and economic problems. This article tests the research hypothesis through an analytical approach.

 

Theoretical Framework

As one of the most transformative developments of recent decades, economic globalization has fundamentally reshaped the structure of international financial and commercial interactions. Building on growing economic interdependence, reduced trade barriers, and increased foreign investment, it has enhanced economic growth while intensifying competition. International organizations such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank propose that globalization has contributed significantly to higher living standards in developing countries. Scholars such as Frankel and Simos underscore the diminishing significance of national borders, the convergence of markets, and the enhancement of multinational production networks.

Globalization has significantly impacted the banking system and international financial flows. Increased economic integration has facilitated the movement of capital across borders, thereby establishing international payment systems, lowering transaction costs, and enhancing access to credit resources. States that fail to adhere to international financial transparency standards face significant limitations on banking and investment activities. To combat money laundering and terrorist financing, the FATF has established regulations that states are required to follow.

Noncompliance with FATF standards may lead to banking restrictions, reduced foreign investment, and obstacles to international trade. Many countries have improved their position in the global financial system by adopting these standards. Conversely, states or entities listed on this organization’s blacklist have faced trade restrictions and economic challenges.

 

Results and Discussion

Iran has remained on the FATF blacklist since 2009 as a result of failing to enact anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing legislation. The organization recommends that member states take targeted measures to address these issues and prevent the financing of terrorism and financial crime. Following the JCPOA in 2015, Iran hoped that complying with FATF standards would alleviate economic pressures and facilitate its integration into the global financial system. Despite a temporary suspension of FATF countermeasures, Iran failed to fully implement FATF standards and was subsequently relisted in 2019.

Iranian administrations have adopted varying approaches toward the FATF. The Ahmadinejad administration rejected these standards, leading to constraints on financial relations with other nations due to a combination of domestic and political factors. Despite the Rouhani administration’s intention to integrate into the global financial system and address economic challenges through international interactions, it ultimately encountered failure in nuclear negotiations and the subsequent withdrawal of Western parties. The Ebrahim Raisi administration exhibited hesitance in fully endorsing the FATF requirements, attributable to its conservative perspectives on foreign affairs and relations with Western nations. Despite international pressure on Iran to join the FATF, certain officials and political factions showed resistance. The Pezeshkian administration has intensified its efforts to address the FATF issue. As a result of governmental initiatives, the Palermo Convention and CFT (Combating the Financing of Terrorism) regulations have been referred back to the Expediency Council for further review.

This situation has had significant adverse effects on the Iranian economy. The failure to comply with FATF standards has severely hindered international financial relations, as well as Iran’s ability to attract foreign investment and expand global trade. Iranian banks have also faced many challenges as a result of limited access to global payment systems and restrictions on international financial transactions. These challenges have resulted in slower economic growth, significant fluctuations in the foreign exchange market, and a loss of public trust in the country’s financial system. To address these issues, Iran needs to adopt FATF standards and implement the necessary financial system reforms.

 

Conclusion

The Islamic Republic of Iran has been on the FATF blacklist since 2009. Despite numerous efforts to enact legislation against money laundering and terrorist financing, it has yet to fully comply with the organization’s standards. Iran’s inclusion on this list has negatively affected its international reputation and intensified economic and diplomatic pressure on the country. Iran’s adversaries, such as the United States and Israel, have leveraged the situation to their advantage. They have, for instance, portrayed Iran as a destabilizing force and a supporter of terrorism. These attitudes, particularly on a global scale, significantly impact public opinion and Iran’s international relations.

Iran must collaborate with the FATF and enact relevant legislation to improve its economic and international standing. By adopting the standards set by the organization, Iran can strengthen financial transparency and more effectively combat money laundering. Furthermore, cooperation with the FATF will strengthen the country’s financial system and improve domestic banking. Given the current circumstances, Iran cannot afford to remain economically isolated. Reintegration into the global banking system appears to be Iran’s primary option for rebuilding and strengthening its economy. Ultimately, removing itself from the FATF blacklist and enacting the necessary legislation is crucial for Iran to attract foreign investment, achieve long-term economic growth, and enhance its economic standing.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Economic Declaration (2024).  University of Toronto, at: https://g7.utoronto.ca/summit/1989paris/communique/index.html
  2. Eggenberger, K. (2018). When is blacklisting effective? Stigma, sanctions and legitimacy: the reputational and financial costs of being blacklisted. Review of International Political Economy25(4), 115-158.
  3. Exclusive interview of the French Weekly Le Point with Ms. Alena Douhan, UN Special Rapporteur (2022).Islamic Republic of Iran Ministry of Foreign Affairs, at: https://en.mfa.ir/portal/newsview/683460/Exclusive-interview-of-the-French-Weekly-Le-Point-with-Ms-Alena-Douhan-UN-Special-Rapporteur
  4. FATF Member Countries (2024). FATF, AT: https://www.FATF-gafi.org/en/the-FATF/history-of-the-FATF.html
  5. Fazelian, R., & Arifnejad, M., & Rusta, Z. (2022). Identification and ranking of foreign direct investment obstacles in Iran: application of fuzzy Delphi method. Applied theories of economics. 9(3), 147-170 doi: 10.22034/ecoj.2022.52564.3084. (In Persian)
  6. Fuladi, M. (2017). Analysis of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) implications of Iran's membership, New Achievements in Humanities Studies, 1(3), 87-93. (In Persian)
  7. History of the FATF (2024). FATF, at: https://www.FATF-gafi.org/en/the-FATF/history-of-the-FATF.html
  8. Hosseini Ahmadfadala, S M., & Jafar Qolikhani, A., & Belwardi, T. (2019). Legal aspects of Iran joining the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). International Police Studies, 11(42), 50-78. https://sid.ir/paper/385838/fa. (In persian)
  9. Jamali Hajiani, A., & Abdulahi, I., & Mirzaei, A. (2023). Money laundering based on the abuse of the international trade system with a look at the fundamental challenges of Iran's trade system. International Studies Journal, 20(1), 257-282. (In Persian).
  10. Jamalihajiani, A., & Ismail, A., & Mirzaei, A. (1402). Iran's legislative approach in reporting suspected money laundering transactions and its legal, jurisprudential and executive obstacles. Doctrines of Jurisprudence and Penal Law, 6(2), 22-40. (In Persian)
  11. Jvanmard, B. (2015). Legal review of Iran's interaction with FATF in preventing money laundering. Journal of the Bar Association, No. 235, 55-63. (In Persian)
  12. Khairani, R., & Zaranshan, Sh., & Suleimanian, M. H. (2022). Assessing Iran's situation in relation to international regulations related to money laundering. Legal Research 21(49), 39-69 doi: 10.48300/jlr.2022.148310. (In persian)
  13. Lincy, V., & Mostatabi, M. (2018). The FATF Keeps Iran on Blacklist While Ignoring Proliferation Financing Threat.“. Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control.
  14. Majlisi, F. (2021). The backwardness of Iran's economy; barter exchanges, Dynamic Economy, accessible at: https://eghtesadepooya.ir/?p=32685. (In Persian)
  15. Mahmoudi, E. (2018). Economic globalization and its impact on inflation in developing Asia, Strategic and Macro Policy, 7(25), 46-65.
  16. Masciandaro, D. (2005). False and reluctant friends? National money laundering regulation, international compliance and non-cooperative countries. European Journal of Law and Economics20, 17-30.
  17. Mazaheri, M. M. (2023). FATF and the list that is still black for Iran. Center for Political and International Studies, accessible at: https://ipis.ir/portal/subjectview/740541. (In Persian)
  18. Norouzi, Meysam, Eskandari Khoshgou, Mehdi and Abolghasemi, Sanaz. (1403). A study of the approach of international financial institutions in preventing and combating money laundering. Quarterly Journal of International Studies, 21(1), 55- 73. (In Persian)
  19. Pourqorban, M., & Zarapour, Sh. (2023). Membership in the Palermo and CFT conventions and its impact on Iran's national security. Politics and international relations. 6 (11), 167-186 doi: 10.22080/jpir.2023.25033.1325. (in Persian)
  20. Producer price index of service sectors (1402). Iran Statistics Center, March 1402 in: https://amar.org.ir/news/ID/15281/total-gozaresh-service-1402--12 (In Persain)
  21. Producer price index of service sectors (2023). Iran Statistics Center, March 1402 in: https://amar.org.ir/news/ID/15281/total-gozaresh-service-1402--12. (In Persian)
  22. Qanberlo, A. (2017). analysis; Status of FATF Bills: Options and Implications, National Security Watch, 82, 42-5. (In Persian)
  23. Salimi, H. (2022). Investment policies in Iran are not transparent. Iran Room Online, accessible: https://otaghiranonline.ir/news/44206/%D8%B3%DB%8C. (In Persain)
  24. Secretariat, U. N. C. T. A. D. (2010). Foreign direct investment, the transfer and diffusion of technology, and sustainable development: note/by the UNCTAD Secretariat.
  25. Sri Lanka settled "$55 million" of its debt to Iran with tea (2024). Trust Online, available at: https://www.etemadonline.com/tiny/news-667580. (In Persian)
  26. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). World Investment Report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. UN.
  27. Yousefi Sadeghlou, A., & student., H. (2015). Challenges and shortcomings of combating money laundering in Iranian law. Private and Criminal Law Research, 12(3), 53-72. (In Persian)
  28. Zare, S., & Esmaili Atoui, S. (2013). Modeling international risk management in the banking of the Islamic Republic of Iran according to the national security components of the Islamic Republic and sanctions conditions. Afaq Security, 7(25), 213-245. (In Persian)