International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Restorative Justice and Capacity Building in Counter-Terrorism Efforts within Europe

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
Mohammad Nassirzadeh 1
Farideh Mohammad Alipour 2
1 Ph.D. Student in International Relations Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/isj.2025.433984.2126
Abstract
European countries primarily address terrorism, a significant security concern, through criminal justice mechanisms and the criminalization of various terrorist activities. However, it is imperative to address the substantial influence of both social and individual factors on the formation and proliferation of terrorist groups. Restorative justice offers decision-makers an alternative strategy to achieve this goal. The main question of this research is: How has restorative justice influenced the fight against terrorism in Europe? This study applied the principles of community of practice theory and the explanatory-constructive method to assist Iranian security policymakers in their efforts to combat terrorism. An analysis of prior experiences in European countries demonstrates that restorative justice is effective in combating terrorism and can promote social peace by redefining individual and social identities. This redefinition encourages individuals to reconsider their terrorist identity, thereby laying the foundation for social peace. Restorative justice enables society to combat extremism effectively and reintegrate individuals by reinforcing societal values and denouncing criminal behavior. This approach is crucial in reducing marginalization and facilitating successful reintegration into society.

Highlights

Introduction

The significance of individual and social factors in the propensity toward terrorism underscores the need to address these aspects in counterterrorism strategies. Both individual mindset and societal influences are pivotal in both fostering terrorism and facilitating disengagement from terrorist groups. Consequently, a primary challenge in combating terrorism lies in the integration of former terrorist members into society. This requires acknowledging the individual and social roots of terrorism while employing social integration as a key strategy in the broader fight against terrorism. Given its substantial potential, many European countries prioritize the use of restorative justice in their counterterrorism efforts. This study aims to investigate how restorative justice influences the fight against terrorism in Europe. It hypothesizes that restorative justice is effective in combating terrorism and can promote social cohesion by reshaping individual and social identities.

 

Methodology

This study employed the community of practice theory to investigate the hypothesis mentioned above. The theory identifies two central components: learning, which bridges the gap between knowledge and action, and actions, which are grounded in social constructs. The theory’s fundamental elements include groups as the primary unit of analysis, the progression of learning through action, and identity development. According to the community of practice theory, learning is viewed as a practical activity where acquiring knowledge necessitates active engagement. This process enables individuals to develop expertise and integrate fully into groups during the socialization process.

This study utilized an explanatory-constructive method. The constructive aspect involved examining the evolution of the relationship between the independent variable, restorative justice, and the dependent variable, counterterrorism efforts in Europe. The explanatory component focused on delineating the outcomes of this relationship, particularly its impact on fostering social peace. Data necessary for this study were collected through a review of credible documents, regulations, and studies documenting the experiences of Spain, Northern Ireland, Kosovo, Germany, and Great Britain in combating terrorism.

 

Findings

Given the psychological and social factors involved, addressing terrorism necessitates an approach that both prevents individuals from being drawn to terrorism and reintegrates former members of terrorist groups into communities aligned with societal values. Consequently, the European Union emphasizes the importance of improving economic and social conditions among marginalized groups to counter extremist ideologies and combat terrorism within society. Restorative justice, which places strong emphasis on these social factors, serves as an effective mechanism in addressing terrorism. This is why the European Union prioritizes the integration of restorative justice in its counterterrorism efforts.

Restorative justice offers a social mechanism distinct from the community of practice, seeking to reconcile and repair social divisions. European countries have increasingly adopted restorative justice as a strategy to counter terrorism, emphasizing both individual and societal factors contributing to terrorist activities. This approach aims to tackle the root social causes underlying terrorism.

In the effort to integrate restorative justice into counterterrorism measures, there has been a shift in focus from the crime itself to the individual offender, prioritizing their rehabilitation over their criminality. Restorative justice views terrorists as individuals who have adopted a terrorist identity within the community of a terrorist group through their actions. According to the community of practice theory, social identity is fluid and can evolve through self-reflection. When terrorists interact with practitioners, such as victims, and hear their stories, they are prompted to reflect on their own identity. This process provides an opportunity for them to disengage from terrorism.

Victims recount the suffering and trauma they endured due to terrorist attacks during the restorative justice process. Indeed, victims’ narratives counter the dominant narrative that influences terrorist groups’ perspectives. As a result, terrorists distance themselves from their former identity shaped by engaging in terrorist activities and endeavor to acknowledge and address the repercussions of their actions.

The process of restorative justice involves criminals reevaluating their identity, actively addressing and making amends for the consequences of their past terrorist acts, and reconstructing their social roles. Victims’ narratives contribute to reshaping individuals’ social roles. Sociologically, restorative justice facilitates the repair of social relationships damaged by terrorist acts. Consequently, these processes enable both offenders and victims to establish healthier social connections and live in a society free from fear and animosity. Restorative justice acknowledges the social dimensions of terrorism and emphasizes the social integration of individuals at risk of radicalization as a preventive measure, reinforcing societal values and acting as a deterrent against terrorism.

Restorative justice emphasizes the recognition and reconciliation of conflicting cultures and values, viewing polarization as a threat to societal cohesion. As a result, restorative justice reduces the marginalization of individuals and reinforces social values, which are crucial elements in combating terrorism. Participation in restorative justice processes helps dismantle terrorist stereotypes and facilitates the integration of former offenders into society, promoting reconciliation between victims and perpetrators.

Keywords
Terrorism
Restoration of Justice
Identity
Community of Practice
Europe

Subjects

  1. Adler, E. (2005). Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundation of International Relations, London: Routledge.
  2. Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, SelfRestraint, and NATO’s Post–Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.
  3. Adler, E. (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International Practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.
  5. Aranguren, I. (2019). El Terrorismo Yihadista en la Encrucijada Oportunidades y Riesgos tras el Derrumbe del Califato. Fundación Centro para la Memoria de las Víctimas del Terrorism, at: https://fundacionvt.org/publicacion/el-terrorismo-yihadista-en-la-encrucijada-2/
  6. Beit Jam, R. , Khosravi, M. A. , Jalali, R. and Sadeghi Haghighi, D. (2023). Analyzing of Anti-Terrorism Normative Strategy between European Union and United States of America in the West Asia. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 19(4), 95-115. doi: 10.22034/isj.2022.364399.1909 (In Persian)
  7. Bertagna, G., Ceretti, A. & Mazzucato, C. (2015). Il Libro Dell’incontro. Milan: Il Saggiatore.
  8. Bicchi, F. (2022). Communities of practice and what they can do for International Relations, Review of International Studies, 48(1), 24–43.
  9. Blakeley, R. et.al. (2019). Leaving the War on Terror: A Progressive Alternative to Counter-Terrorism Policy, Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. Available at: www.tni.org.
  10. Bueger, Ch. & Gadinger F. (2018). International Practice Theory. Second Edition, Palgrave:
  11. Bueger, Ch. (2012). Communities of Practice in World Politics – Theory or Technology? 52nd Annual Conference of the International Studies Association. Montreal: Canada.
  12. Butt, R., & TUCK, H. (2010). European Counter-Radicalisation and De-radicalisation: A Comparative Evaluation of Approaches in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and Germany, European Counter-Radicalisation and De-radicalisation. Retrieved from: https://www.eukn.eu/fileadmin/Files/News/De-radicalisation_final.pdf.
  13. Bytyci, F. (2019). Kosovo brings back fighters, families of jihadists from Syria, reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kosovo-syria-idUSKCN1RW003.
  14. Carter, B. (2017). Analyzing the Criminal Justice and Military Models of Counterterrorism: Evidence from the United States. Master thesis, United States: University of Kansas.
  15. Ceberio, M. (2020). Ética y autocrítica entre rejas. El País. Available at: https://elpais.com/espana/2020-08-05/amor-sin-papeles-entre-rejas.html.
  16. Cornut, J. (2018). Diplomacy, Agency and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice, European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 712–736.
  17. Council of Europe Committee on Counter-Terrorism .(2023). counter-terrorism strategy for 2023-2027 .Available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/pages/result_details.aspx?objectid=0900001680a9ad67
  18. Council of Europe. (2018). Counter-Terrorism Strategy (2018-202(Availableat: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016808afc96.
  19. Daly, K. (2016). What is restorative justice? Fresh answers to a vexed question, Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 9–29.
  20. Dandurand, Y. (2020). Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes. Second Edition. United Vienna: Nations Office on Drugs and Crime United Nations Office.
  21. De Bie, L. (2016). Involvement Mechanisms of Jihadist Networks. Perspectives on Terrorism. 10(5), 22-41.
  22. Erelle, A. (2015). Skyping With the Enemy: I Went Undercover as a Jihadi Girlfriend. The Guardian, Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/may/26/french-journalist-poses-muslim-convert-isis-anna-erelle.
  23. Esmaili, M., & Ebrahimi, F. (2023). Rehabilitation of the Perpetrators and the Experiences of Victims of REstorative Justice. Journal of Judicial Law Views, 24(86), 21-44. (In Persian)
  24. Eu (2019). Returning Foreign Terrorists: Kosovo Seeks to Integrate ‘ISIS’ Returnees Back Into Society. Available at: https://www.eubulletin.com/10297-returning-foreign-terrorists-kosovo-seeks-to-integrate-isis-returnees-back-into-society.html.
  25. European Commission. (2024). About RAN Practitioners. Available at .: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/radicalisation-awareness-network-ran/about-ran_en.
  26. Forgiveness project. (2019). Jo Berry and Pat Magee. Available at: https://www.theforgivenessproject.com/stories/jo-berry-pat-magee/.
  27. Fuller, A. (2007). Critiquing Theories of Learning and Communities of Practice. In Hughes, J. Jewson, N. & Unwin, (eds). Communities of Practice. Critical Perspectives, London: Routledge.
  28. Gal, T. Dancig-Rosenberg, H., & Guy, E. (2018). Measuring the restorativeness of restorative justice: The case of the Mosaica Jerusalem Programme. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 1(2), 252–273.
  29. Gal, T., & Dancig-Rosenberg, H. (2020). Characterizing multi-door criminal justice: A comparative analysis of three criminal justice mechanisms. New Criminal Law Review, 23(1), 139–166.
  30. Grimmel, A., & Hellmann, G. (2019). Theory Must Not Go on Holiday. Wittgenstein, the Pragmatists, and the Idea of Social Science. International Political Sociolog, 13(2), 198-214.
  31. (2020). Beratungsprinzipien. Available at: https://hayat-deutschland.de/hayat-deutschland/?c=beratung.
  32. (2020). Influencing and Promoting Global Peace and Security. Available at: https://behorizon.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Horizon-Insights-2020-3.pdf.
  33. (2018). Iraq sentences German woman to death for joining Isis, reports say. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-iraq-sentence-death-german-teenager-linda-wenzel-baghdad-a8170461.html.
  34. Infantino, F. (2019). How does Policy Change at the Street Level? Local Lnowledge, A Community of Practice and EU Visa Policy Implementation in Morocco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 47(5), 1-19.
  35. Jamshidi, M., & Rahbari, H. (2020). Homegrown Terrorism in Europe. International Relations Researches. 9(35), 223-250. (In Persian)
  36. Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative Justice. Ideas, Values, Debates. London: Routledge.
  37. Kuru, D. (2019). Back at Home: The Ambassadors Conference as an Interstitial Practice. Global Affairs, 5(4-5), 295–313.
  38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Lotfi, M., & Dehghani, Firoozabadi, S. J. (2023). A New Approach to the Study of Regional Integration: Practice Theory and its Application in European Integration Studies. Political and International Approaches. 15(1), 11-34. (In Persian)
  40. Marshall, C. (2007). Terrorism, Religious Violence and Restorative Justice. In V. Ness & G. Johnstone (eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
  41. Mirmajidi, S. (2021). Characteristics of the Desirable Model of Restorative Justice Programs in Cases of Sexual Violence: A Look at the Iranian Judicial Discourse. Judiciarys Law Journal, 85(114), 433-463. (In Persian)
  42. Mothers for life. (2020). Nicola Benyahia: Available at: http://www.mothersforlife.org/en/keyparents/nicola-benyahiha.
  43. Neumann, P. et.al. (2007). Recruitment and Mobilisation for the Islamist Militant Movement in Europe. London: ICSR.
  44. Olson, J. & Sarver, R. S. (2021). How Restorative are You? Introducing the Restorative Index. Victims & Offenders, 17(6), 1-33.
  45. Onur, S. (2018). Challenges Post-Daesh Challenges for Europe, Horizon Insights.
  46. Parliamentary Assembly. (2016). Foreign Fighters in SyriaandIraq. at: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=22482&lang=en
  47. Parliamentary Assembly. (2018). Counter-narrativesto terrorism. Available at : https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=24810&lang=en.
  48. Plesch, V. & Haxhiaj, S. (2019). Kosovo is trying to reintegrate ISIL returnees. Will it work? Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2019/6/9/kosovo-is-trying-to-reintegrate-isil-returnees-will-it-work.
  49. Porter, L., & Kebbell, M. (2011). Radicalisation in Australia: Examining Australia’s Convicted Terrorists. Psychiatry. Psychology and Law. 18(2), 212-231.
  50. Puigvert, L. et.al. (2020). Grassroots community actors leading the way in the prevention of youth violent radicalization. PLoS ONE 15(10),1-29.
  51. Radfar, F., & Dehghani Firoozabadi, S. J. (2022). The Practice Theory of International Relations. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 18(4), 7-21. doi: 10.22034/isj.2022.330824.1758 . (In Persian)
  52. Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2021). The potential of restorative justice in cases of violent extremism and terrorism. This document has been prepared for the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: The potential of restorative justice in cases of violent extremism and terrorism, 2021 (europa.eu).
  53. Rahmati, R. (2023). Islam in Sweden: A Social, Political, or Security Issue?. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 20(1), 57-79. doi: 10.22034/isj.2023.356221.1885 (In Persian)
  54. Ramos, M. (2019). El dique moral. Las víctimas del terrorismo como freno a la espiral de violencia. In A. Rivera Blanco (Ed.), Nunca hubo dos bandos: Violencia política en El País Vasco, 1975–2011 [There were never two sides. Political violence in the Basque Country 1975–2011].Comares. 175–198.
  55. Ríos, C. (2013). El encuentro personal entre quienes asesinaron perteneciendo a ETA y quienes sufrieron el horror injustificado, Descripción, análisis y reflexiones. IN E. Coord & P. Rodríguez, Los ojos del otro. Encuentros restaurativos entre víctimas y ex miembros de ETA. Santander: Salterrae, 187-224.
  56. Saltman, M. & Smith, M. (2015). Till Martyrdom Do Us Part. Gender and the ISIS Phenomenon. London: Institute for Strategic Dialogue. Available at: https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Till_Martyrdom_Do_Us_Part_Gender_and_the_ISIS_Phenomenon.pdf.
  57. Sarid, A., & Levanon, M. (2021). Rethinking the Theory of Communities of Practice in Education: Critical Reflection and Ethical Imagination. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 54(10), 1-12.
  58. Segovia, M. (2013). Los etarras arrepentidos Guisasola y Alza se unen a Mintegi y Urizar en el homenaje a Joseba Goikoetxea, El Mundo. Available at: https://www.elmundo.es/pais-vasco/2013/11/22/528f360663fd3dc00f8b456a.html.
  59. Sondarjee, M. (2020). Collective Learning at the Boundaries of Communities of Practice: Inclusive Policymaking at the World Bank.
  60. Sondarjee, M. (2021). We Are a Community of Practice, Not a Paradigm! How to Meaningfully Integrate Gender and Feminist Approaches in IR Syllabi. International Studies Perspectives. 23(3), 1-20.
  61. Soto, Tamara Martínez. (2021). Justicia restaurativa como sistema complementario al proceso penal. hacia una reparación integral a las víctimas del terrorismo. lecciones aprendidas desde la experiencia en España, Revista de Victimología, Núm(12), 111-136.
  62. Stephens, G. (2021). It’s because of community meeting: toward a responsive reconceptualization of social emotional learning. Educational Action Research. 31(2), 1-18.
  63. Sultan, O., Biffi, E & Cebrián, P. (2020). Reintegration of ISIS Returnees: A Myth or Reality? Beyond the Horizon ISSG Head Office, at: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/desktop/irua
  64. Suzuki, M., & Jenkins, T. (2020). The role of (self-)forgiveness in restorative justice: Linking restorative justice to desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 19(2), 1-18.
  65. Tavakoli, S., & nattagh poor, M. (2022). Analyzing the Reasons and Motives of European Youth Joining the Takfiri Group of ISIS. Defensive Researches and Management, 21(96), 77-108. (In Persian)
  66. Thakkar, M., & Speckhard, A. (2023). IS-Affiliated Financial Networks Double Down on their Efforts of Exfiltrating Loyalists, Particularly IS Young Boys, from Camp al Hol. International Studies Journal (ISJ), 20(2), 161-186. doi: 10.22034/isj.2023.182470 (In Persian)
  67. Uğur, O. (2018). What Comes After ISIS: A Sociological Analysis of Radicalisation into Violent Extremism, Horizon Insights: Available at: https://behorizon.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/HORIZON-INSIGHTS-JOURNAL-Volume-1-Issue-1.pdf.
  68. United Nations. (2017). Security Council. S/RES/2396.
  69. United Nations. Office of Counter-Terrorism. (2017). Enhancing the Understanding of the Foreign Terrorist Fighters Phenomenon in Syria, at: https://f-origin.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/2725/files/2018/02/ONU_Report_Final_2017.pdf
  70. Vaandering, D. (2013). A window on relationships: Reflecting critically on a current restorative justice theory. Restorative Justice. 1(3), 311–333.
  71. Volpe, R. (2007). Restorative Justice in Post- Disaster Situations: Untapped Potential. Cardozoj. Conflct Resolution, 8(2), 611-621.
  72. Walgrave, L. (2015). Domestic Terrorism: A Challenge for Restorative Justice. Restorative Justice. An International Journal, 3(2), 282–290.
  73. Walgrave, L., Ward, T. & Zinsstag, E. (2021). When restorative justice meets the Good Lives Model: Contributing to a criminology of trust. European Journal of Criminology, 18(3), 444-460.
  74. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  75. Wenger, E., McDermott, A. & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press.
  76. White, M. (1989). The externalisation of the problem and the re-authoring of relationships. In M. White (Ed.), Selected papers Adelaide, South Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications. 5-28.
  77. Wong, W., and Gavrielides, T. (2019). Restorative Justice in Educational Settings and Policies: Bridging the East and West, London: RJ4All Publications.
  78. Wood, S. (2021). Local Grounding of Transnational Private Governance Authority: Translation, Contestation, Legitimation and Communities of Practice. New Political Economy, 240-256.
  79. Zernova, M. (2019). Restorative justice in the aftermath of politically-motivated violence: the Basque experience. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(4), 649-672.