International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

The Role of National and International Tribunals in Protecting the Right to Fresh Water Access -Safe and Affordable

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
Azam Asayesh Zarchi 1
Ali Seif 2
Ali Saneian 2
1 Department of ِِ Energy Economics - Faculty of Environmental Science and Energy - Azad university of Science and Research branch
2 M.A. of Diplomacy and International Organizations, Department of Peace and Security and Human Rights, Faculty of International Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
10.22034/isj.2023.291468.1515
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to depict the link between human right principles and access to fresh water, which are intertwined and more importantly fresh water access is an integral part of universal human rights. It aims to convey that the provision of fresh water to people needs to be covered by relevant judiciary system, so that it can protect people of any denial/ hindrance to fresh water access and in the case of violation, how they can find legal solution. Consequently, point out how legal venues can be used to address any violations or shortcomings in regard to provision of fresh water to people. The notion that the people are rights holders and governments are deemed as primary duty bearers to provide fresh water safely and affordable requires recognizing the legality of it by local, national or state. In the nutshell, provision of fresh water is not an advantage given to the people, but is the people’s right, albeit observing affordability and safely factors. Every local and national governing bodies has to consider managing the supply of fresh water as well as incorporate the enforcement clauses in their legal system. In case local/national legal system does not have the framework to address the issues regarding potential denial/dispute about supply of fresh water, the Regional Human Right Courts and other remedial mechanisms are another legal venue to ensure that laws are interpreted consistently according to international human rights within the framework of holistic consideration of people’s dignity and equality.
Keywords
Right to Fresh Water
International Tribunals
and Human Right Jurisprudence

Subjects

  1. According to CBC Canada network (2020). October 25.
  2. ACHR v. SUDAN (2009). Sudan Human Rights Organization and Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions v Sudan.
  3. BANGLADESH (2005). Rabia Bhuiyan v Ministry of LGRD.
  4. BRAZIL, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, First Chamber (1999). Ademar Manoel Pereira x Companhia Catarinense de Agua e Saneamento – CASAN.
  5. de Albuquerque, V. Roaf. (2012) On the right track – Good practices in realizing the rights to water and sanitation, available at: www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/WaterAndSanitation/SRWater/Pages/SRWaterIndex.aspx
  6. Canada Supreme Court (2011). Halalt First Nation v. British Columbia (Environment), 13 July.
  7. Commune de Saint-Jean d’Aulps c/ Syndicat des copropriétaires de l’immeuble Relais de la Terche et autre (2009). Conseil d’Etat 300608, No paragraph or page numbers are available for this case.
  8. (2000). 25/89, 47/90, 56/91 & 100/93, AHRLR 74.
  9. Decreto presidencial de zona de monumentos históricos (1972).
  10. Dowdell and Others v. City of Apopka (1983). Florida, 698 F. 2d 1181. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, February.
  11. FRANCE, Conseil Constitutionnel (2012). Fédération Départementale des Syndicats d’Exploitants Agricoles du Finistère.
  12. FRANCE, Cour de Cassation (2004). Madame X c/ Commune d’Amiens.
  13. Frente Amplio Opositor a Minera San Xavier c/ Minera San Xavier SA de CV y Otros (2007). Tribunal Latinoamericano del Agua, at: http://tragua.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Caso-Mina-San-Javier.pdf
  14. Guidelines for drinking-water quality (2011). Guidance for water quality: WHO, Geneva, 4th edition.
  15. http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriAdmin.do?oldAction=rechJuriAdmin&idTexte=CETATEXT000021164447&fastReqId=1891469650&fastPos=1.
  16. IACHR/PARAGUAY (2006). Case of the Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay.
  17. INDIA, Supreme Court (2012). Consumer Protection Foundation v Delhi Administration and Other.
  18. Malaya, the High Court (2004). the Rajah Ramachandran v Perbadanan Bekalan Air Pulau Pinang Sdn Bhd.
  19. Oxfam warned in a report posted (2017). November 24.
  20. Red de Vigilancia y Exigibilidad de los Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales Región Junín c/ Municipal idad Provincial de Huancayo (2005). Corte Superior de Justicia, Junín.
  21. SOUTH AFRICA, High Court (2001). Highveldridge Residents Concerned Party v Highveldridge TLC and Others.
  22. SOUTH AFRICA, High Court (2011). Beja and Others v Premier of the Western Cape and Others.
  23. Supreme Court WP (Civil). (2002). Environment & Consumer Protection Foundation v Delhi Administration and Others. no. 631, at: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/192582350/
  24. The Bangladesh Environment Conservation Act (1995). available at: http://www.doe-bd.org/2nd_part/153-166.pdf
  25. The Constitution of Kenya (2010). Available at: http://www.kenyaembassy.com/pdfs/The%20 Constitution%20of%20Kenya.pdf
  26. The Environment Conservation Rules (1997). available at: http://www.moef.gov.bd/html/laws/env_law/178-189.pdf
  27. TLA/ARGENTINA. (2012). Fundación Chadileuvú c/ Estado Nacional Argentino y Provincia de Mendoza.
  28. TLA/PERU. (2012). Grupo de Formación e Intervención para el Desarrollo (Gufides) y Plataforma Inter-institutional Celendina (PIC) c/ Estado Peruano y Minera Yanacocha SR case.
  29. UN CESCR (2000). General Comment No.14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health. August 1, E/C.12/2000/4, available at: http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(symbol)/E.C.12.2000.4.En
  30. UN CESCR (2008). “General Comment 15” in Note by the Secretariat, Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9.
  31. UN CESCR (2008). General Comment 3, in Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 [10].
  32. UN CESCR. (2000). General Comment 14. Available at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/comments.htm
  33. UN CESCR. (2002). General Comment 15, at: https://www.globalhealthrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/CESCR-General-Comment-No.-15-The-Right-to-Water.pdf
  34. UNHRC (2009). Report of the Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Related to Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque. UN Doc A/HRC/12/24, UNHRC Sanitation Report, 66.
  35. UNHRC (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation. (2011) UN, Doc A/HRC/18/33, UNHRC Planning Report.
  36. UNHRC Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Related to Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation. (2010). Good Practices” related to Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation: Questionnaire.
  37. UNHRC Non-State Actors Report (2021). No.14, 47 & 50.
  38. UNHRC Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation (2013). A/HRC/24/44 [12].
  39. UNHRC. (2010). Report of the Independent Expert on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Related to Access to Safe. Drinking Water and Sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque. UN Doc A/HRC/15/31 (UNHRC Non-State Actors Report)