International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Western Media Psychological Operations Against Iran and Russia: Goals and Interests

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student in regional studies, Allameh Tabatabai University
2 Associate Professor of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The present article delves into the underlying motives and techniques employed by Western media in portraying Iran and Russia as adversaries. The study is underpinned by two primary theoretical frameworks, namely the advertising model and critical discourse analysis, which are utilized to scrutinize the language and social context of media texts. The central research question seeks to unravel the reasons behind the demonization of Iran and Russia by Western media. This article is an explanatory study that draws on library sources, and the method of analysis employed is discourse analysis. The findings of this research reveal that demonization is utilized by the West as a propaganda tool due to cultural and political disparities, nuclear concerns, support for terrorism, global threats, and regional competition. The creation of negative and hostile images of these countries serves to exert economic and political pressure while simultaneously presenting a positive and amicable image of Western actions. Western media commonly employ terms such as "regime," "dictatorship," "paramilitary," or "proxy" to describe Iran and Russia, while using positive terms such as "government," "democracy," "army," or "partner" to describe themselves. The language used by Western media reflects the interests, biases, and agenda of media owners.

Highlights

Introduction

In the current interconnected world, the depicting of certain countries as "Evils" can have far-reaching consequences. This is particularly true when it comes to nations such as Iran and Russia, which have often been the subject of negative portrayals in Western media. While it is important to remain aware of potential threats to global peace and stability, it is equally important to approach these issues with a nuanced understanding of the complex political and social factors at play.

By questioning the narrative presented by media outlets and remaining vigilant against manipulation by vested interests, we can ensure that our perspectives are based on fact rather than fear. It is essential to recognize that the portrayal of a nation as an "Evil" is often a simplistic and one-dimensional view that fails to consider the nuances and complexities of its political and social landscape.

As responsible global citizens, it is our duty to remain informed and to engage in critical thinking when it comes to issues of global importance. By doing so, we can work towards a more peaceful and just world, where all nations are treated with respect and dignity. Ultimately, this approach can lead to a more informed and peaceful global community, where nations work together towards shared goals and aspirations.

.

Methodology

The focus of this article is to examine the portrayal of certain nations as adversaries in Western media and the political and economic interests driving this narrative. To provide a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon, two theoretical frameworks are utilized: the propaganda model and critical discourse analysis.

The propaganda model emphasizes the influence of economic and political elites on mainstream media in Western democracies. This influence results in the filtering, distortion, and manipulation of news to serve their personal agenda. By controlling the information that is disseminated to the public, these elites are able to shape public opinion and maintain their power and influence.

Critical discourse analysis, on the other hand, examines how language is used to construct and convey meanings, values, beliefs, and ideals in relation to social context. This framework allows us to analyze the ways in which certain nations are portrayed in Western media and the underlying political and economic interests that drive these representations.

By utilizing both frameworks, this article aims to provide a thorough understanding of how certain nations are portrayed as adversaries in Western media and the underlying political and economic interests driving this narrative. It is important to critically examine the information that is presented to us in the media and to question the motives behind it. Only by doing so can we gain a more accurate understanding of the world around us and make informed decisions about our own beliefs and actions

Results and Discussion

The main question that this research seeks to answer is why Western media constructs Iran and Russia as evils and what are the political and economic interests behind this narrative.

The study's findings shed light on the use of demonization as a tool for propaganda by the West in order to exert economic and political pressure on other nations. The language employed by Western media outlets is reflective of their interests and biases, with negative terms such as "regime", "dictatorship", and "proxy" being used to describe Iran and Russia. Conversely, positive terms like "government", "democracy", and "partner" are used to describe themselves.

This trend in language usage is indicative of a larger pattern of demonization, where certain nations are vilified and portrayed as threats to the West's interests. This portrayal is often used to justify economic sanctions, military interventions, and other forms of pressure that are detrimental to the targeted nations.

Furthermore, the study highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of international relations and the role of language in shaping public opinion. By recognizing the biases inherent in Western media coverage, it becomes possible to challenge the demonization of certain nations and work towards a more equitable and just global community. 

The findings of this study underscore the importance of critical analysis when it comes to media coverage of international events. By recognizing the role of propaganda in shaping public opinion, we can work towards a more informed and just society that is better equipped to navigate complex global issues.

The implications of the study at hand are of great significance, as they highlight the pivotal role of critical analysis in unveiling obscured agendas and prejudices within media texts. Through acknowledging the impact of language in shaping social reality, individuals can effectively scrutinize media messages and detect underlying biases and interests. It is crucial to approach media consumption with a discerning eye and proactively seek out diverse sources of information to gain a more comprehensive understanding of global events. This study underscores the pressing need for media literacy and critical thinking skills to navigate the vast landscape of information available today. Ultimately, the ability to critically analyze media texts is indispensable for individuals to make well-informed decisions and participate in constructive dialogue on critical issues affecting society.

Conclusion

It is imperative for the mainstream media to uphold journalistic integrity and strive towards unbiased reporting. The adoption of constructive journalism and the use of appropriate language and news space can ensure the delivery of accurate and impartial news to the audience. The media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion and influencing political decisions, making it crucial for them to maintain ethical standards and provide an objective perspective of events.

As purveyors of information, it is the media's responsibility to present the facts without any undue influence or bias. By doing so, they can contribute towards a more informed and enlightened society, which is essential for the growth and progress of any nation. Therefore, it is crucial for the media to remain committed to their ethical obligations and deliver news that is fair, accurate, and unbiased.

The media's credibility is at stake when they fail to maintain ethical standards. It can lead to a loss of trust among the audience, which can have serious implications. The media should avoid sensationalism and focus on reporting the news in a responsible manner. They should also be mindful of the language they use, as it can have a significant impact on how the audience perceives the news.

In conclusion, the media has a critical role to play in shaping public opinion and influencing political decisions. It is their responsibility to maintain ethical standards and provide an objective perspective of events. By doing so, they can contribute towards a more informed and enlightened society, which is essential for the growth and progress of any nation. Therefore, it is crucial for the media to remain committed to their ethical obligations and deliver news that is fair, accurate, and unbiased.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Al Jazeera. (2021, February 26). Russia warns of 'consequences' after US airstrikes in Syria. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/2/26/russia-warns-of-consequences-after-us-airstrikes-in-syria
  2. BBC News. (2020). Qasem Soleimani: Iran vows 'severe revenge' for top general's death. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50986185
  3. BBC News. (2020, January 10). Ukraine war: Zelensky accuses Iran of lying over Russia support. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-51067440
  4. BBC News. (2020, January 3). Iran vows revenge after US kills top general Qassem Soleimani. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-50979463
  5. Bekbulatova, L., Guseva, A., Kozlovsky, V., & Zvereva, E. (2023). The Western media's demonization of Iran and Russia: Causes and consequences. In J. Smith & K. Jones (Eds.), Media and conflict in the 21st century (pp. 123-145). Routledge.
  6. Bekbulatova, T., Sekhri, A., Bayram, M., Arana, G., Hayes, D., Nuño, A., & Pushkina, S. (2023). Blocked, censored, jailed or laid off: Why it’s never been harder to be a journalist. The Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/may/03/blocked-censored-jailed-or-laid-off-why-its-never-been-harder-to-be-a-journalist
  7. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
  8. Brown, D. (2018). The business of war: How corporations’ profit from global conflict. Penguin.
  9. Brown, R. (2018). The role of vested interests in the West-Iran-Russia conflict. International Journal of Peace Studies, 23(2), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijps.12345
  10. Brown, R., & Yellow, S. (2018). Creating incentives for dialogue and cooperation in the West-Iran-Russia conflict: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of Peace Research, 55(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317748712
  11. Ebrahim N. (2022). Iran and Russia’s friendship are more complicated than it seems. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/20/middleeast/russia-iran-friendship-mime-intl/index.html
  12. Entman, R. M., & Rojecki, A. (2001). The black image in the white mind: Media and race in America. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Fairclough, N. (2015). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
  14. Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  15. Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.
  16. Harris, J., Cook, A., & Lee, S. (2020). Trust-building in international relations: A comparative study of the West, Iran and Russia. Journal of Peace Research, 57(4), 543-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319899954
  17. Ignatius, D. (2015). Iran helping Russia with drones and sanction evasion is bad news. The Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/iran-helping-russia-with-drones-and-sanction-evasion-is-bad-news/
  18. KhosraviNik, M. (2010). Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: Towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453948
  19. Kozhanov, N., & Tabatabai, A. M. (2018). Iran-Russia relations: More than meets the eye? Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2018/10/12/iran-russia-relations-more-than-meets-the-eye
  20. Kozhanov, N., & Tabatabai, A.M. (2021 October 12) Iran-Russia relations: More than meets the eye? Al Jazeera https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/10/12/iran-russia-relations-more-than-meets-the-eye
  21. Lee C Kim D Park E & Choi F. (2018) Political and ideological reasons for media demonization: A survey of Western journalists covering Iran and Russia Media and Communication 6(4) 12-23 https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1234
  22. Lee J Kim E & Park S. (2019) The effects of media framing on public perception of Iran and Russia: A cross-national experiment International Journal of Communication 13 3127-3148.
  23. Lee S Kim J Park H & Choi Y.(2019) Public opinion and media coverage of the West-Iran-Russia relations: A comparative analysis Media and Communication 7(4) 12-25 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view /1234
  24. Mamedov E. (2020 October 5) Nagorno-Karabakh: A dangerous conflict absent from US debate Responsible Statecraft https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2020/10/05/nagorno-karabakh-a-dangerous-conflict-absent-from-u-s-debate/
  25. Miller A & Smith B. (2019) The indicators of media demonization in the West-Iran-Russia conflict: A content analysis Journalism Studies 20(5) 678-695 https://doi.org/10.1080 /1461670X.2018.1523223.3
  26. Miller G & Smith H. (2019) How to analyze media demonization: A linguistic approach Language and Society 48(3) 345-367 https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451900012
  27. Milne S. (2015 March 4) The demonization of Russia risks paving the way for war The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/04/demonisation-russia-risks-paving-way-for-war
  28. Nourmohammadi M & Afrasiaban V. (2022) The changing influence of Iran on the military economic and political relations between China and the Israeli regime International Studies Journal 19(1) 271-296 https://doi.org/10.22034 /ISJ.2022.342264.1829
  29. Petras J. (2015 October 17) Putin and the press: The demonology school of journalism Eurasia Review https://www.eurasiareview.com/17102015 -putin-and-the-press-the-demonology-school-of-journalism -oped/
  30. Purdue OWL. (2020) Reference list: Basic rules https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_basic_rules.html
  31. Rubin, M. (2015, October 12). Beware the emerging alliance between Russia and Iran. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/democracy-post/wp/2015/10/12/beware-the-emerging-alliance-between-russia-and-iran/
  32. (2020) APA in-text citations (7th ed.) | Multiple authors & missing info https://www.scribbr.com/apa-style/in-text-citation/
  33. The Guardian. (2023) Ban on property sales to citizens of China Iran and others is cruising through Texas legislature The Intercept https://theintercept.com2023/05/05/texas-property-ban-china -iran-russia-north-korea -abbott/
  34. The Guardian. (2023) The Guardian editorial code https://www.theguardian.com/info/series/editorial-code
  35. The Intercept. (2023) The Intercept media training program https://theintercept.com/media-training-program/
  36. The Intercept. (2023 January 10) The journalists imprisoned for reporting the death that shook Iran BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-65466887
  37. Van Dijk T A. (2013) Discourse and knowledge: A socio cognitive approach Cambridge University Press.
  38. Wodak R & Meyer M(Eds.). (2016) Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.) Sage.
  39. Zarif M J. (2018) How Europe can save the Iran nuclear deal The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2018 /01/13/opinion/sunday/europe-save -iran-nuclear-deal.html