International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Regional change processes and their impact on Turkey's geopolitical competition 2016-2022 (Eastern Mediterranean, South Caucasus, and Ukraine crisis)

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
Ebrahim Bagheri 1
Mohammad Reza Majidi 2
Farshad Azimi 3
1 Ph.D. Student in Regional Studies (European studies), Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran Senior researcher of Iran-Europe relations
2 Associate professor, Department of Regional studies University of Tehran
3 M.A. in Regional Studies(Middle East studies), Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran
10.22034/isj.2023.361648.1904
Abstract
Since the global system is increasingly unstable and cracked, we are in the middle of a series of regional transformation processes that have created the possibility of fundamental changes in the traditional order and subsequently in the behavior patterns of the actors. These processes of change and transformation have led to fundamental changes in the traditional ways of pursuing interests and in general the foreign policy strategies of global and regional actors. Due to its sensitive geopolitical situation, Turkey has faced many challenges in foreign and defense policy as a result of regional transformation processes. This issue has caused Turkey to be in a continuous geopolitical battle simultaneously on many fronts from the Eastern Mediterranean to the South Caucasus and the Ukraine crisis due to the power gaps that have emerged in the neighboring geography. The question of the current research is what effect the processes of regional change have had on Turkey's geopolitical competition in the surrounding areas؟ The current research hypothesizes that Turkey, by emphasizing the principle of self-help in the framework of the processes of change and transformation of the global and regional order, seeks flexible and dynamic alliances and shapes the vital space and united regions in line with the goal of strategic and balanced independence. Establishing relations with the West and the East is one of the emerging trends of foreign policy. The method of descriptive-analytical research and the method of data collection is the library.
Keywords
geopolitical competition"
Turkey"
Eastern Mediterranean"
Ukraine crisis"
"
South Caucasus"

Subjects

  1. Ahmadi, S. A., Badii Azandahi, M., Heydari Mosulu, T. (2017). Theoretical explanation of the change in the nature of geopolitical regions in the competition between powers. International Quarterly of Geopolitics, 13(47), 55-78. (In Persian)
  2. Askerov, A. (2017). Turkey’s “Zero Problems with the Neighbors” Policy: Was It Realistic. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 4(2), 149-167.
  3. Aslan, M. (2022). XII of Sweden and Finland. Charles. https://www.setav.org, at: https://www.setav.org/isvec-ve-finlandiyanin-xii-charlesi/ (In Turkish)
  4. Austvik, O. G., Rzayeva, G. (2017). Turkey in the geopolitics of energy. Energy Policy, Vol. 107, 539-547.
  5. Barrinha, A. (2014). The Ambitious Insulator: Revisiting Turkey’s Position in Regional Security Complex Theory. Mediterranean Politics, 19(2), 165-182.
  6. Brende, B., Allen, J., Funabashi, Y., García, L., Harman, J., Lukyanov, F., Niblett, R., Saran, S., Yadlin, A., Zhenhong, Q. (2020). Shaping a Multiconceptual World 2020, Comparative Strategy, 38(3).
  7. Dalay, G. (2022). Turkey gains much from NATO, but a rocky road lies ahead. https://www.chathamhouse.org, at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/07/turkey-gains-much-nato-rocky-road-lies-ahead
  8. G.(2022). Ukraine’s wider impact on Turkey’s international future. https://www.chathamhouse.org, at : https://www.chathamhouse.org/2022/03/ukraines-wider-impact-turkeys-international-future.
  9. Dervis, k. (2018). Global power is shifting. Is it the end of multilateralism?. at: https://www.weforum.org, at:https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/07/is-this-the-end-of-multilateralism.
  10. Durul, T. (2020). 5 soruda Dogu Akdeniz’de neler oluyor. https://www.aa.com.tr, at:  https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/5-soruda-dogu-akdenizde-neler-oluyor/1973679.
  11. Gasimli, V. (2021). The ‘Zangezur Corridor’ is a geo-economic revolution. https://emerging-europe.com, at: https://emerging-europe.com/voices/the-zangezur-corridor-is-a-geo-economic-revolution/.
  12. Glassner, M. I. (1999). Geopolitics: Past, Present, and Future. Perspectives on Political Science, 28(4), 239-258.
  13. Golmohammadi, V. (2021). Transformation in Turkey’s strategic culture and national security doctrine; Rotation or balance in foreign policy.  Journal of Strategic Studies, 24(92), 73-104. (In Persian)
  14. GolMohammadi, v. (2021). Evolution in strategic culture and national security doctrine of Turkey; Rotation or balance in foreign policy? Strategic Studies Quarterly, 24(92), 73-104. (In Persian)
  15. Gurcan, M. (2019). Eastern Mediterranean Heats up as Gas Rivalry Stakes Grow Higher. https://www.almonitor.com, at: https://www.almonitor.com/pulse/originals/2019/06/turkey-eastern mediterra nean-heats-up-gas-rivalry-grows.
  16. Harris, B. (2022). Congress signals openness to Turkey F-16 sale amid Ukraine cooperation. https://www.defensenews.com at: https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2022/05/04/congress-signals-openness-to-turkey-f-16-sale-amid-ukraine-cooperation/.
  17. Haugom, L. (2019) Turkish Foreign Policy Under Erdogan: A Change in International Orientation?
  18. Hu, Z., Lu, D. (2016). Re-interpretation of the classical geopolitical theories in a critical geopolitical perspective. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(12), 1769-1784.
  19. Ikenberry, G. (2018). The End of Liberal International Order. International Affairs, 94(1).
  20. Karbuz, S. (2018). Geostrategic Importance of Eastern Mediterranean Gas Resources. Dorsman, A. B. In Ediger, V. and Karan, B. (eds.) Energy, Economy, Finance and Geostrategy. Springer, 237-255.
  21. Kibaroglu, M. (2012). What went wrong with the “zero problem with neighbors” doctrine. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11(3), 85-93.
  22. Kirisçi, K., Toygür, I. (2019). Turkey’s new presidential system and a changing West: Implications for Turkish foreign policy and Turkey-West relations. Turkey Project Policy Paper, 15.
  23. Mevlutoglu A. (2016). turkey defense reform detection and recommendation. https://setav.org, at : https://setav.org/assets/uploads/2016/09/20160901200637_turkiyenin-savunma-reformu-pdf1.pdf.
  24. Milli Savunma Sanayi Bakanllgl, (2019). Strategic-Plan-2019-2023. https://www.sbb.gov.tr, at:https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Stratejik-Plan-2019-2023.pdf. (In Turkish)
  25. Montgomery, s.l. (2022). War in Ukraine is changing energy geopolitics. https://theconversation.com, at: https://theconversation.com/war-in-ukraine-is-changing-energy-geopolitics-177903.
  26. Mortimer, C. (2019). Turkey-Cyprus Dispute: Why Are the Two Countries Arguing over Drilling ight s?. avibile at: Euronews. https://www.euronews.com, at https://www.euronews.com/2019/06/ 24/turkey-cyprus-dispu te-why-are-the-two-countries-arguing-over-drilling-rights.
  27. Mousavi, M., Zarei, B., Pishgahifard, Z., Badiee Azandehie, M., & Vasegh, M. (2021). Theoretical Specification of Aspects of Geopolitical Relations and a Proposed Model. Human Geography Research, 53(3), 811-832.
  28. Murphy, A. (2015). Nationalism, sovereignty, social constructs, human
    http://www.exploringgeopolitics.org, at: http://www.exploringgeopolitics.org/interview murphy alexander nationalism
    overeignty social constructs human_rights geopolitical concepts ideas imagination.
  29. Oral, M. (2019). The key to global power struggles and survival. Geopolitics. (In Turkish)
  30. ozcan, G. (2012). Policy of Zero Problems with the Neighbours. IEMed Mediterranen Yearbook Med, 59-63.
  31. Ozcan, N. A. (2020). On the ‘military’ character of Turkish foreign policy. https://www.milliyet.com.tr, at: https://www.milliyet.com.tr/yazarlar/nihat-ali-ozcan/turk-dis-politikasinin-askeri-karakterine-dair-6129334.
  32. Ozkizil cik, O. (2021). Turkey is helping contain Iran by encircling its sphere of influence. https://www.trtworld.com, at: https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/turkey-is-helping-contain-iran-by-encircling-its-sphere-of-influence-47771.
  33. Pirinççi, F. (2020). Dogu Akdeniz Rekabeti Türkiye’nin Mücadelesini Daha da Güçlendiriyor. https://kriterdergi.com, at: https://kriterdergi.com/dis-politika/dogu-akdeniz-rekabeti-turkiyenin-mucadelesini-daha-da-guclendiriyor.
  34. Rolander, N., Ummelas, O. (2022). Why Sweden’s Stance on Kurds Riles Turkey’s Erdogan. https://www.washingtonpost.com, at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/why-swedens stance-on-kurds-riles-turkeyserdogan/2022/05/18/4bce097e-d6ad-11ec-be17 286164974c54_story.html.
  35. Safavi, H., Shamsabadi, A. (2021). Investigating the motives of the government of justice and development of Turkey from the military-political campaign in Nineveh province of Iraq. International Studies Quarterly, 18(3), 29-52. (In Persian)
  36. Tapia, F. (2022). The balancing act of Turkish foreign policy and the war in Ukraine. https://www.ieee.es, at: https://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_analisis/2022/DIEEEA31_2022_ENG.pdf.
  37. Turak, N. (2022). Conflict, politics and history: Why Turkey is standing in the way of Sweden and Finland’s NATO bids. https://www.cnbc.com, at : https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/23/why-turkey-doesnt-want-sweden-finland-to-join-nato.html.
  38. Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2019). T.C. Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2019-2023. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data, at : https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/BAKANLIK/2019-2023-stratejik-plani.pdf.I. (In (Turkish)
  39. Türkiye Disisleri Bakanllgi. (2019). T.C. Disisleri Bakanllgi 2019-2023 Stratejik Planı. https://www.mfa.gov.tr, at : https://www.mfa.gov.tr/data/BAKANLIK/2019-2023-stratejik-plani.pdf.
  40. unay, S. (2021). The Aegean Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean in the Global and Regional Balance Based on the Axes of Geography, History and International Law. (In Turkish)
  41. Yackley, A. (2020). How Turkey militarized its foreign policy. https://www.politico.eu, at: https://www.politico.eu/article/how-turkey-militarized-foreign-policy-azerbaijan-diplomacy/.
  42. Yesiltas, M. (2020). The Rise of Turkey’s ‘Military Activism’: The Causes, Context and Strategic Implications. SETA Publications, No. 69.
  43. Yesiltas, M., Ozdemir, G. (2022). Turkey’s Geopolitical environment in 2022. https://setav.org, at: https://setav.org/assets/uploads/2022/02/R194-GuvenlikRadari-2022.pdf .
  44. Yücesoy, V. (2019). The Recent Rapprochement Between Iran and Turkey: is it Durable or is it a Relationship of Convenience? Turkish Studies, 9(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2019.1657773.