International Studies Journal (ISJ)

International Studies Journal (ISJ)

Right to Water in Framework of European Court of Human Rights Judicial Precedent

Document Type : Original Independent Original Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of International Law Department, Abadeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadeh, Iran.
2 Master of Private Law and Deputy of the Cooperative of the General Department of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare of Isfahan Province.
3 Master of Private Law and Legal expert of water resources department of Abadeh City, Fars Province.
Abstract
The right to water is stated in the General Comment No. 15 adopted in 2002 by the Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights; this Comment is the major document prepared to explain the legal fundamentals of this right and its relation to other economic and social rights. Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights also explicitly recognizes the right to water. As an environmental matter, the right to safe water entitles individuals to sufficient, physically accessible, and affordable water for personal and domestic uses. Since its establishment, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has played a key role in developing and promoting international rights. This descriptive-analytical paper intends to answer this question: What is the judicial precedent of ECHR about the right to water? Delving into several important cases on the right to water under investigation in ECHR, this paper concluded that an extensive and dynamic interpretation of Articles 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and human rights resolutions clearly shows that they explicitly recognize the human right to water. All states are obliged to ensure the realization of this right in a non-discriminatory manner.

Highlights

Introduction

Access to clean water and adequate sanitation is essential to the realization of the third generation of human rights. In countries without a water and sanitation service, people lack access to the adequate amount of water. They may, however, gain access to water through unhygienic ways thus jeopardizing other rights such as those to food, housing, health, and education. Entitlement to the right to water is different and varies according to various factors. States should come up with effective solutions to guaranteeing the water right as a third-generation human right and to ensure its general sustainability. States commitment to providing access to the right to water and sanitation is indispensable for schools, healthcare centers, prisons, workplaces, and public places because it has a direct relationship with the right to life, and states bear different responsibilities in various institutional areas and may need to introduce new regulations to their domestic body of laws and regulations. On the other hand, there mustn’t be a restriction on access to water and sanitation because states are obliged to supply clean water to their citizens. From the perspective of the third-generation human rights, access to affordable water and sanitation services is the starting point for countries to make decisions regarding the financing and general policy of water supply and sanitation services; this view differs from the pure economic view. This paper addresses, in three parts, the right to water in the judicial precedents (aggregate of court rulings) of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Part 1 is about the right to water in the International Environmental Law. Part 2 delves into major human rights documents on the right to water. And Part 3 analyzes the ECHR precedents/rulings about the right to water and relevant cases. Considering the ECHR precedents about the right to water, this paper seeks to take a special look at the cases being heard in the ECHR and asserts the right to water on the basis of human rights documents. It also aims to eliminate the ambiguities surrounding the right to water as a cross-generational subject of human rights through the aggregate of the ECHR judicial precedents/rulings. Removing the ambiguities, this paper sheds a light on every aspect of the right to water.

 

Methods

This paper adopted a descriptive-analytical method to answer its main question: What is the judicial precedent of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) about the right to water? The paper scrutinized international human rights documents, third-generation human rights documents, and several important cases being heard in the ECHR regarding the right to water.  

 

Findings

An extensive and dynamic interpretation of Articles 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and human rights resolutions clearly shows that they explicitly recognize the human right to water. All states are obliged to ensure the realization of this right in a non-discriminatory manner. Examining the steps taken by different states in providing access to clean water, the European Council on Environmental law concluded that every individual is entitled to the right to water. Access to an adequate amount of clean water is indispensable for human life. Although there is no separate clause in human rights documents on this right, it can be deduced against the backdrop of these documents. Examining the cases for which the ECHR has passed a judgement as well as other human rights conventions such as Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights; the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and human rights resolutions, the judgements are mostly in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, i.e. states. Article 35 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights recognizes every individual’s right to preventive healthcare and states that individuals are entitled to healthcare services under the conditions established by national laws and practices in their countries. Article 4 of the European Social Charter addresses the right to health; to protect this right, states are obliged to directly or in association with public and private organizations provide the conditions for proper education in the areas of health and personal responsibility.

 

Results

There need to be established necessary conditions for everybody to gain the right to water. However,

Some individuals require special attention. For instance, there are a number of homeless people in small rural communities who cannot pay the water fees. Therefore, typical public measures regarding the right to water don’t prove helpful in this case. The European Council examined the performance of its member states and concluded that every person is entitled to the water right, and in a resolution passed in April 2000, this Council specified the content of this right: the right to water cannot be separated from other recognized human rights. The Council called on the states to ensure this right for all without any discrimination. However, we need a global approach to safeguard this resource: passing a new international treaty regarding the protection of the global environment; establishing an international water committee under the supervision of the UN that deals with matters such as preserving, managing, and using international waters, and attends to concerns raised about the environment; and finally introducing a humanitarian international law that addresses the protection of the environment, which is threatened increasingly by the rising destructive power of arms/weapons. This law should be able to legally limit the countries manufacturing destructive weapons (weapons of mass destruction). Should these steps fail to yield the desired results, the global community would be doomed to a huge water war in the future.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Amiri, M. Raisi, L. Raee, M. (2020). Implementation of the country's obligations regarding the right to the environment, Quarterly Journal of International Studies. 17(3), 135-155 (In Persian). Doi:  22034/ISJ.2021.258336.1302
  2. Mirzadeh, N. Sepehri, F. (2013). The Interaction of the Right to a Healthy Environment and Health. Islamic Human Rights Quarterly, 2(4). (In Persian)
  3. Moradi, H. (2017). International Environmental Law. (4). Second Edition, Tehran (In Persian)
  4. Naderi, SH., Afshari, M., Farshchi, M., Porhashemi. S. (2020). Methods of implementing sustainable development goals in the Persian Gulf region from the perspective of international environmental law. Quarterly Journal of International Studies. (16)3, 111-131 doi: 22034/ISJ.2020.113674 (In Persian)
  5. Palmertz, M. (2009). Regulating Environmental Law: A Review of the Arhas Convention. Arbitrator Law Journal. Translated by Ali Mashhadi, Shahid Beheshti University. 16(2) (In Persian)
  6. Parandemotlagh, A. Porhashemi, S. SH, S. Zare, A. (2021). Implementation of International Environmental Law in the Iranian Legal System. Quarterly Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 121-138. (In Persian)
  7. Rai Dehghi, M. Mousavi, K. (2016). Law seekers and defenders from the perspective of human rights, with emphasis on the procedure of the European Court of Human Rights. Legal Journal. 55(3). (In Persian)
  8. Ramezani Ghavamabadi, M. Manesh, J. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Concept of Stakeholder in Environmental Lawsuits in EU and Iran Law. Quarterly Journal of Public Law Studies. 46(4). (In Persian)
  9. Rezaei, R. (2016). A Look at the Impact and Position of Climate Change in the International Human Rights System. Especially Examples of the Third Generation. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Environmental Law, 1(1) (In Persian)
  10. Palmer, R. Short, D. Ted Auch, W.(2018). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. TheHumanRighttoWaterandUnconventionalEnergy. Int. J. Environ. Res.
  11. European Convention on Human Rights, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 1
  12. Riad and Idiab v Belgium (App nos 29787/03 and 29810/03) ECHR 24 January 2008 <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/page s/search.aspx?i=001-108395 >. Case summary based on the journal article by: Vivien Deloge, ‘Road to 2015: The European Union and the Realisation  of the Human Right to Water’ (2012) 16 New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law 1, 16-19.
  13. SNS-89/CONF.602/7, (Final Report and Recommendations of an International Meeting of Experts on the Further Study of the Concept of the Rights of People for UNESCO, 22 February 1990).
  14. A/RES/21/58 (XXI), 25 November 1966, (PERMANENT SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES).
  15. A/RES/2158 (XXI), 25 November 1966, (PERMANENT SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES).
  16. Zander v Sweden (App no 14282/88) ECHR 25 November 1993<http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/fra/page s/search.aspx?i=001-57862>.
  17. Tadevosyan v Armenia (App no 41698/04) ECHR 2 December 2008 <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/page s/search.aspx?i=001-89969>. For further analysis,
  18. N. Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development, June 20-22, 2012, The Future We Want, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.216/L.1 (June 19, 2012)
  19. Dubetska and Others v Ukraine (App no 30499/03) ECHR 10 February 2011<http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/page s/search.aspx?i=001-103273>.