فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی

فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی

شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل متحد و معماری حکمرانی جهانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی- پژوهشی مستقل

نویسندگان
محمد نصیرزاده 1
فریده محمدعلی‎پور 2
سید محمد امین علوی شهری 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه خوارزمی. تهران. ایران
2 دانشیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل. دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی. دانشگاه خوارزمی. تهران. ایران.
3 پژوهشگر گروه مطالعات بنیادین حکمرانی، دفتر مطالعات حکمرانی، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی. تهران ایران
10.22034/isj.2026.517556.2334
چکیده
فضاهای اجتماعی متکثری که بر اساس هنجارهای خاص در عرصه حکمرانی جهانی ایجاد شده‌اند، در تعامل با یکدیگر، سبب تکوین معماری حکمرانی جهانی شده‌اند. در این معماری، حقوق بشر به‌عنوان یکی از هنجارهای بنیادین، زمینه‌ساز تعامل میان بلوک‌های مختلف است. در این راستا، شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل متحد نهاد مرکزی معماری حکمرانی جهانی به‌شمار می‌آید. پرسش اصلی مقاله این است که شورای حقوق بشر سازمان ملل متحد چگونه بر معماری حکمرانی جهانی تأثیر گذاشته است؟ هدف پژوهش، تبیین نقش و جایگاه شورای حقوق بشر در معماری حکمرانی جهانی حقوق بشر و شناسایی سازوکارهایی است که این نهاد از طریق آن‌ها بر رعایت هنجارهای حقوق بشر توسط دولت‌ها تأثیر می‌گذارد. پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از نظریه اجتماع مبتنی بر رویه و کاربست روش تبینی ـ تکوینی و با هدف یاری رساندن به سیاست‌گذاران کشور در جهت فهم بهتر حقوق بشر در بستر معماری شبکه حکمرانی انجام شده است. پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که شورای حقوق بشر در تعامل با بازیگرانی که در بلوک‌های دیگری از معماری حکمرانی جهانی حقوق بشر قرار دارند، نقشی کلیدی ایفا می‌کند. این امر سبب گردیده است تا دولت‌ها یا از طریق مسیر اقناعی نظیر بررسی دوره‌ای جهانی و یا فشارهای سیستمی همچون تعامل رویه‌های ویژه و کمیته حقیقت‌یاب با نهادهای قهری، به رعایت حقوق بشر ملزم شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
شورای حقوق بشر
معماری حکمرانی جهانی
اجتماع مبتنی بر رویه
یادگیری اجتماعی
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The UN Human Rights Council and the Architecture of Global Governance

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Nassirzadeh 1
Farideh Mohammad Alipour, 2
Seyyed Mohammad Amin Alavi shahri 3
1 Ph.D. Student in International Relations ,Faculty of Law and Political Science. Kharazmi University
2 Associate Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Researcher, Fundamental Governance Studies Group, Governance Studies Office, Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The plural social spaces that have emerged in global governance around particular norms interact with one another and, through these interactions, contribute to the formation of the architecture of global governance. Within this architecture, human rights, as a fundamental normative domain, provide a basis for interaction among different blocs. In this context, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) constitutes a central institution within the architecture of global human rights governance. The main question of this article is how the UNHRC has influenced the architecture of global governance. The study aims to explain the role and position of the UNHRC within the architecture of global human rights governance and to identify the mechanisms through which the Council influences states’ compliance with human rights norms. Drawing on the communities of practice perspective and employing an explanatory–genetic research approach, the study seeks to contribute to policymakers’ understanding of human rights within the networked architecture of global governance. The findings demonstrate that the UNHRC plays a significant role through its interaction with actors situated in other blocs of the architecture of global human rights governance. Through these interactions, states may be encouraged to comply with human rights norms either through persuasive mechanisms, such as the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), or through systemic pressure, including the interaction of Special Procedures and fact-finding missions with coercive institutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Global Governance Architecture
United Nations Human Rights Council
Communities of Practice
Social Learning
1.    بیگلربیگی، کیان، و عزیزی، ستار. (1403). تحریم‌های حقوق بشری: محتمل‌ترین پیامد تشکیل هیات مستقل بین‌المللی حقیقت‌یاب برای ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی، 21(2)، 35-55.
2.    نواب دانشمند، فریبا؛ هاشمی، سید محمد، و رنجبریان، امیر حسین. (1400). جایگاه و کارکرد کمیتۀ مشورتی شورای حقوق بشر در نظام بین‌المللی حقوق بشر.  فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، 51(3)، 841-864.
3.    رادفر، فیروزه، و دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سیدجلال. (1401). نظریه کردارگرایی روابط بین‌الملل. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌الملل، 18(4)، 7-21.
4.    لطفی، میلاد، و دهقانی فیروزآبادی، سیدجلال. (1402). نگرشی نوین به مطالعه همگرایی منطقه‌ای: کردارگرایی و کاربست آن در مطالعات همگرایی اروپا. رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌الملل، 15(1)، 11-34.
1.      Aboueldahab, S. (2022). The End of the Al-Khatib Trial. Völkerrechtsblog, at: https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/the-end-of-the-khatib-trial/.
2.      Adler, E. (2005). Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundation of International Relations. London: Routledge.
3.      Adler, E. (2008). The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post–Cold War Transformation. European Journal of International Relations. 14(2). 195–230. doi: 10.1177/1354066108089241.
4.      Adler, E. (2019). World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.      Adler, E., Bremberg, N., Sondarjee, M. (2024). Communities of Practice in World Politics: Advancing a Research Agenda. Global Studies Quarterly, 4(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1093/isagsq/ksad070.
6.      Arias, S., & Kaya, A. (2025). Power by Proxy: Participation as a Resource in Global Governance. Review of International Organizations, 1–30. doi: 10.1007/s11558-025-09585-4.
7.      A/HRC/RES/22/13.
8.      A/HRC/RES/52/2.
9.      A/HRC/RES/52/27.
10.   A/HRC/WG.6/26/VEN/2.
11.   A/RES/69/188.
12.   Barnett, M. (1998). Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order. New York: Columbia University Press.
13.   Betsill, M. M., Benney, T. M., Gerlak, A. K. (2019). Agency in Earth System Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.   Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
15.   Boyashov, A. (2022). Network Governance of the UN Human Rights Council: Diplomatic, Institutional, and Organizational Actors. London and New York: Routledge.
16.   Boyd, D., Knox, J., & Henry, C. (2019). Amici Curiae Brief of Special Rapporteurs on Human Rights and the Environment in Support of Admissibility. at: https://www.hausfeld.com/uploads/documents/crc_admissibility_brief_boyd_knox_final_-_1_may_2020.pdf.
17.   Brown Weiss, E., & Jacobson, H. K. (1998). Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.   Bueger, C., & Gadinger, F. (2018). International Practice Theory. Second Edition. Palgrave: Macmillan.
19.   Checkel, J. T. (2006). International Institutions and Socialization in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.   Cornut, J. (2018). Diplomacy, Agency and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 712–736. doi: 10.1177/1354066117725156
21.   De Vries, B. (2019). Could International Fact-Finding Missions Possibly Render a Case Inadmissible for the ICC? Remarks on the Ongoing Attempts to Include International Criminal Law in Fact-Finding. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 1–24. doi: 10.1093/jcsl/krz028.
22.   European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Daoudi v. France: Daoudi v. France – 19576/08. at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-1184%22]}.
23.   European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Case of Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania. at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22sort%22:[%22kpdate%20Descending%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-205509%22]}.
24.   European Court of Human Rights. (2024). Pietrzak and Bychawska-Siniarska and Others v. Poland. at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22sort%22:[%22kpdate%20Descending%22],%22itemid%22:[%22002-14333%22]}.
25.   Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.
26.   Hong, M. H. (2018). Legal Commitments to United Nations Human Rights Treaties and Higher Monitoring Standards in the Universal Periodic Review. Journal of Human Rights, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2018.1432342.
27.   Human Rights Council. (2024a). Welcome to the Human Rights Council. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/about-council.
28.   Human Rights Council. (2024b). About Special Procedures. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures-human-rights-council.
29.   ICC. (2022). Observations on the Crimes of Sexual Slavery, Enslavement and Trafficking in Persons, and on the Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility: Defences of Duress, Mental Defect or Disease and the Non-Punishment Principle. at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2022_00285.PDF.
30.   Infantino, F. (2019). How Does Policy Change at the Street Level? Local Knowledge, a Community of Practice and EU Visa Policy Implementation in Morocco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1662717
31.   International Court of Justice. (2020). Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar). at: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/178/178-20200123-ORD-01-00-EN.pdf.
32.   International Court of Justice. (2024). Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem. at: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf.
33.   Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.   Kim, Y. (2023). A Network Analysis of Naming and Shaming in the Universal Periodic Review. International Interactions, 287–314. doi: 10.1080/03050629.2023.2172003.
35.   Krasner, S. D. (1983). International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36.   Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.   McGaughey, F. (2021). Non-Governmental Organisations and the United Nations Human Rights System. London and New York: Routledge.
38.   Molloy, S. (2024). The Universal Periodic Review and Peace Agreement Implementation: Conceptualising Connections, Challenges, and Ways Forward. London Review of International Law, 95–122. doi: 10.1093/lril/lrae010.
39.   Mukherjee, A. (2011). The Fact-Finding Missions of the Special Rapporteur on Torture. The International Journal of Human Rights, 265–285. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2011.537470
40.   Ohchr (2014). DPRK: Achieving Accountability Is Paramount, UN Expert Says Ahead of General Assembly’s Key Vote. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2014/11/dprk-achieving-accountability-paramount-un-expert-says-ahead-general.
41.   OHCHR. (2015). Commissions of Inquiry and Fact-Finding Missions on International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/CoI_Guidance_and_Practice.pdf.
42.   Ohchr. (2024a). Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures-human-rights-council.
43.   OHCHR. (2024b). Impact of the Work of Special Procedures: Mechanisms of Redress. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures-human-rights-council/impact-work-special-procedures-mechanisms-redress#Advocating.
44.   Ohchr. (2024c). Impact of the Work of Special Procedures: Human Rights Mainstreaming. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures-human-rights-council/impact-work-special-procedures-human-rights-mainstreaming.
45.   Ohchr. (2024d). Partnering with Other Organizations. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-water-and-sanitation/partnering-other-organizations.
46.   Ohchr. (2024e). Impact of the Work of Special Procedures: Facilitating Dialogue and/or Coalition Building. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures-human-rights-council/impact-work-special-procedures-facilitating-dialogue-andor-coalition-building.
47.   Ohchr. (2024f). Submissions to Courts: Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-torture/submissions-courts.
48.   Ohchr. (2024g). Submissions to Courts: Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights. at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-terrorism/submissions-courts.
49.   Ralph, J. (2023). On Global Learning: Pragmatic Constructivism, International Practices and the Challenge of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.   Rücker, J. (2015). Importance and Impact of NGOs at the Human Rights Council. at: https://ishr.ch/latest-updates/importance-and-impact-ngos-human-rights-council/.
51.   Sarid, A., Levanon, M. (2021). Rethinking the Theory of Communities of Practice in Education: Critical Reflection and Ethical Imagination. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2021.1935234.
52.   Schimmelfennig, F. (2000). International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action in an Institutional Environment. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 109–139. doi: 10.1177/1354066100006001005.
53.   Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S. (2024). Complementing UN Human Rights Efforts Through Universal Periodic Review. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1–25. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huae008.
54.   Sondarjee, M. (2021). Collective Learning at the Boundaries of Communities of Practice: Inclusive Policymaking at the World Bank. Global Society, 35(3), 307–326. doi: 10.1093/isagsq/ksad071.
55.   Speckhard. A. (2020). Perspective: Ireland’s Lisa Smith Is a Test Run on Repatriation of ISIS Women. Homeland Security Today.
56.   Star. S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001.
57.   Sterken, S., & Pohl, D. (2023). The Architecture of Global Governance: Paths of Approach. Architectural Theory Review, 27(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/13264826.2023.2241238.
58.   Sunga, L. (2011). How Can UN Human Rights Special Procedures Sharpen ICC Fact-Finding? The International Journal of Human Rights, 15(2), 187–205. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2011.537466.
59.   S/2014/872.
60.   S/24657.
61.   S/RES/780.
62.   Terman. R. (2023). The Geopolitics of Shaming: When Human Rights Pressure Works—and When It Backfires. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
63.   UN General Assembly. (2005). A/RES/60/251.
64.   United Nations. (1945). United Nations Charter. at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter.
65.   Wiener, A. (2018). Constitution and Contestation of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
66.   Zarakol, A. (2014). What Made the Modern World Hang Together: Socialisation or Stigmatisation? International Theory, 6(2), 311–332. doi: 10.1017/S1752971914000141.