<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>مهدی ذاکریان

فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌المللی با مشارکت انجمن علمی مطالعات صلح ایران فعالیت می‌کند.</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌ المللی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-2045</Issn>
				<Volume>10</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship between Due diligence in International Humanitarian Law and the Responsibility to Protect</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>رابطه اصل تلاش مقتضی در حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه و مسئولیت حمایت</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>247</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>269</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">221718</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>عارفه</FirstName>
					<LastName>فروتن</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد حقوق بین‌الملل دانشگاه قم</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ریحانه</FirstName>
					<LastName>دست افکن</LastName>
<Affiliation>کارشناس ارشد حقوق بین‌الملل دانشگاه قم</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>03</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Due diligence implies to minimum standards that disrespect to them lead to responsibility of the state. In fact, International Humanitarian Law is associated with jus ad bellum and includes a set of rules that are govern on the war time and are considered to be protective. But the scope in the Humanitarian Law is not obvious and moreover recognition of doctrine of Responsibility to Protect would amount to the question that whether breach of due diligence bring Responsibility to Protect for state and international community? What is the threshold of state’s responsibility under the International Humanitarian Law? When this threshold lead to responsibility to protect? Our hypothesis in this article is that if states violate from due diligence in respecting human rights, responsibility to protect would create. Therefore, governments to avoid being held responsible, must adhere to their obligations in time of war. In this study we used library and Internet resources with a descriptive- analytic approach.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">اصل تلاش مقتضی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مسئولیت حمایت</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">مسئولیت بین‌المللی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">نقض تعهد</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.isjq.ir/article_221718_080e379fb803008e00a33e41d9712c27.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
